These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7182966)

  • 1. Programmed visual field testing.
    Anderson DR
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1982; 80():326-48. PubMed ID: 7182966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Peritest automatic perimeter in screening for glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Douglas GR
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1983 Dec; 18(7):318-20. PubMed ID: 6671150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitation of glaucomatous visual field defects with the Mark II Friedmann analyzer.
    Hicks BC; Anderson DR
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1983 May; 95(5):692-700. PubMed ID: 6846460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A clinical comparison of the Friedmann visual field analyser and tangent screen perimetry.
    Gutteridge IF
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1982 Feb; 59(2):184-94. PubMed ID: 7065111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The screening of the central visual field.
    Krieglstein GK; Andrae K
    Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol; 1975; 193(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 1078956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fully automated screening procedure for early detection of visual field defects.
    Postaire JG; Hache JC; Diaf M
    J Biomed Eng; 1986 Apr; 8(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 3713148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Threshold Amsler grid testing. Cross-polarizing lenses enhance yield.
    Wall M; Sadun AA
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1986 Apr; 104(4):520-3. PubMed ID: 3954654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Customized, automated stimulus location choice for assessment of visual field defects.
    Chong LX; McKendrick AM; Ganeshrao SB; Turpin A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Apr; 55(5):3265-74. PubMed ID: 24781947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parallel rarebits: a novel, large-scale visual field screening method.
    Lin SR; Fijalkowski N; Lin BR; Li F; Singh K; Chang RT
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Nov; 97(6):528-33. PubMed ID: 25331077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of quantitative testing with the Octopus, Humphrey, and Tübingen perimeters.
    Mills RP; Hopp RH; Drance SM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1986 Oct; 102(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 3766667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptive programs for analysis of the visual field by automatic perimetry--basic problems and solutions. Efforts oriented towards the realisation of the generalised spatially adaptive Octopus program SAPRO.
    Haeberlin H; Fankhauser F
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1980 Dec; 50(1):123-41. PubMed ID: 7472130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Modern perimetry: automatic or manual?].
    Etienne R; Etienne A; Sellem E
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1983; 6(11):927-32. PubMed ID: 6672066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automatic computerized perimetry in the detection of neurological visual field defects. A pilot study.
    Bynke H; Heijl A
    Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol; 1978 Apr; 206(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 306205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An automated measuring system for fundus perimetry.
    Nishida Y; Murata T; Yoshida K; Sawada T; Kani K
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2002; 46(6):627-33. PubMed ID: 12543188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Techniques and developments in automated perimetry: a review.
    Wild JM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1988; 8(3):295-308. PubMed ID: 3077648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical experience with the Fieldmaster perimeter.
    Bobrow JC; Drews RC
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1982 Feb; 93(2):238-41. PubMed ID: 7065096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The qualitative comparative analysis of the visual field using computer assisted, semi-automated and manual instrumentation: II. Statistical analysis.
    Wild JM; Flanagan JG; Barnes DA; Gilmartin BA; Good PA; Crews SJ
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1984 Dec; 58(4):325-40. PubMed ID: 6525935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Oculographic automatic perimetry in glaucoma visual field screening: a clinical study--preliminary results in glaucoma patients.
    Ticho U; Zauberman H; Faibish E; Armon H; Weinman J
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1979 Sep; 47(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 520141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing field defects of the low-vision patient.
    Goodlaw EI
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1981 Jun; 58(6):486-91. PubMed ID: 7270658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated suprathreshold static perimetry.
    Johnson CA; Keltner JL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1980 May; 89(5):731-41. PubMed ID: 7377271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.