These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7184616)
1. Visual field in childhood. Verriest G Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 1982; 202():41-58. PubMed ID: 7184616 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Usefulness of multifocal VEP in a child requiring perimetry. Yukawa E; Matsuura T; Kim YJ; Taketani F; Hara Y Pediatr Neurol; 2008 May; 38(5):360-2. PubMed ID: 18410854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Eccentric fixation in Stargardt's disease assessed by Tübingen perimetry. Messias A; Reinhard J; Velasco e Cruz AA; Dietz K; MacKeben M; Trauzettel-Klosinski S Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Dec; 48(12):5815-22. PubMed ID: 18055836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry: a method of automated static perimetry for children using eye tracking. Murray IC; Fleck BW; Brash HM; Macrae ME; Tan LL; Minns RA Ophthalmology; 2009 Oct; 116(10):2017-26. PubMed ID: 19560207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of visual evoked potentials, automated perimetry and frequency-doubling perimetry in early detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Sarić D; Mandić Z; Iveković R; Geber MZ; Benić G; Tomić Z; Grgić D Coll Antropol; 2005; 29 Suppl 1():111-3. PubMed ID: 16193690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The reliability of frequency-doubling technology (FDT) perimetry in a pediatric population. Becker K; Semes L Optometry; 2003 Mar; 74(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 12645850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Visual evoked potentials and static perimetry in functional visual deficits]. Sobolewski P; Stankiewicz A Klin Oczna; 1998; 100(4):221-4. PubMed ID: 9770981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A child with epilepsy in whom multifocal VEPs facilitated the objective measurement of the visual field. Yukawa E; Kim YJ; Kawasaki K; Taketani F; Hara Y Epilepsia; 2005 Apr; 46(4):577-9. PubMed ID: 15816954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual event-related potentials of infants during a modified oddball procedure. Karrer R; Ackles PK Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl; 1987; 40():603-8. PubMed ID: 3480181 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Visual fields in young children treated with vigabatrin. Agrawal S; Mayer DL; Hansen RM; Fulton AB Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Jun; 86(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 19417698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Kinetic outline perimetry as a technique for examining the visual fields of young children. Barnard NA Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1989 Oct; 9(4):463-4. PubMed ID: 2631022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual field loss in young children and mentally handicapped adolescents receiving vigabatrin. Werth R; Schädler G Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jul; 47(7):3028-35. PubMed ID: 16799049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual fields and eye movements in a harbor seal (Phoca vitulina). Hanke W; Römer R; Dehnhardt G Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2804-14. PubMed ID: 16564067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pupillary dilation and its effects on automated perimetry results. Kudrna GR; Stanley MA; Remington LA J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):675-80. PubMed ID: 8576532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]