These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7184885)
1. Different penal systems and some consequences for forensic psychiatry. Beyaert FH Int J Law Psychiatry; 1982; 5(3-4):425-9. PubMed ID: 7184885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Courtroom psychiatrists: expertise at the cost of wisdom? Kaplan LV; Miller RD Int J Law Psychiatry; 1986; 9(4):451-68. PubMed ID: 3583525 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Forensic psychiatry in The Netherlands: positioning and functioning of Dutch forensic psychiatrists. Schnitzler JG Int J Law Psychiatry; 1983; 6(3-4):443-55. PubMed ID: 6679534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Competence to stand trial in Connecticut. Herron DC; Zonana HV; Crane LE Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1983; 11(3):261-71. PubMed ID: 6640120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Forensic psychiatric assessment in the USSR]. Friemert K Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1988 Nov; 40(11):671-7. PubMed ID: 3237873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Report of the U.S. Delegation to assess recent changes in Soviet psychiatry. Schizophr Bull; 1989; 15(4 Suppl):1-219. PubMed ID: 2638045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. An introduction to law relevant to mentally disordered offenders. Dolan B Crim Behav Ment Health; 2004; 14 Suppl 1():S12-8. PubMed ID: 16575810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Georgia Court Competency Test: the base-rate problem. Wildman RW; White PA; Brandenburg CE Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 1):1055-8. PubMed ID: 2377402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A paradoxical outcome of a regional review board decision: a case report. Cashman FE Can J Psychiatry; 1988 Nov; 33(8):778. PubMed ID: 3203282 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Forensic telepsychiatry in the United Kingdom. Saleem Y; Taylor MH; Khalifa N Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(3):333-44. PubMed ID: 18548516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In defense of the insanity defense. Beigel H Hillside J Clin Psychiatry; 1983; 5(1):73-90. PubMed ID: 6662497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The expert witness in forensic psychiatry. Chaplow DG; Peters JL; Kydd RR Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1992 Dec; 26(4):624-30. PubMed ID: 1476528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The ethical dilemmas of forensic psychiatry: a utilitarian approach. Halleck SL Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):279-88. PubMed ID: 6478070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The inanity of insanity: some improper applications of the insanity defense. Rachlin S Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1981 Sep; 32(9):642-4. PubMed ID: 7275043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Insanity defense continues to draw attention in Washington, state capitols. Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1983 Jan; 34(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 6826158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. An introduction to law relevant to mentally disordered offenders. Dolan B Crim Behav Ment Health; 2004; 14(2 Suppl):S12-8. PubMed ID: 23570119 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethics and expert witnesses: the troubled role of psychiatrists in court. Clements CD; Ciccone JR Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 6743845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The insanity defense: a difficult necessity. McGrath JJ Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Jan; 36(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 3967874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Further comments on the insanity defense in the aftermath of the Hinckley trial. Halpern AL Psychiatr Q; 1984; 56(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 6522530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]