These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7185814)

  • 1. Effects of stimulus frequency, level, and duration on auditory temporal ordering.
    Parker RM; Kasten RN; McCroskey RL; Hoyer EA
    J Aud Res; 1981 Oct; 21(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 7185814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimal time interval in auditory temporal resolution.
    Muchnik C; Hildesheimer M; Rubinstein M; Sadeh M; Shegter Y; Shibolet B
    J Aud Res; 1985 Oct; 25(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 3843099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal summation in normally and abnormally hearing chinchillas.
    Davis RI; Ferraro JA
    J Aud Res; 1983 Oct; 23(4):281-92. PubMed ID: 6681328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Duration discrimination in listeners with cochlear hearing loss: effects of stimulus type and frequency.
    Grose JH; Hall JW; Buss E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Feb; 47(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 15072523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory evoked potentials in the detection of interaural intensity differences in children and adults.
    Wambacq IJ; Koehnke J; Shea-Miller KJ; Besing J; Toth V; Abubakr A
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):320-31. PubMed ID: 17485981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequency and intensity effects on ear dominance for tone bursts.
    Leek MR; Brandt JF
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 7187913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tuning properties of the auditory frequency-shift detectors.
    Demany L; Pressnitzer D; Semal C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1342-8. PubMed ID: 19739748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monaural auditory adaptation of reaction times at .5, 1, and 3 kc/s.
    Davis JM; Weiler EM; Sandman DE
    J Aud Res; 1986 Oct; 26(4):261-6. PubMed ID: 3436925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The reliability of MCLs with pure tones and damped wave trains.
    Berger KW; Shiplett LL
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 7187911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of level and background noise on interaural time difference discrimination for transposed stimuli.
    Dreyer AA; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):EL1-7. PubMed ID: 18177063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of extended-range frequency-response amplification in hearing aids.
    Forrester JI; Raffin MJ
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 7187908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
    Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interference and enhancement effects on interaural time discrimination and level discrimination in listeners with normal hearing and those with hearing loss.
    Smith-Olinde L; Besing J; Koehnke J
    Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 15248807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Temporal stimulus structure, gestalt perception and electrodermal reaction pattern].
    Baltissen R
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1993; 40(1):18-43. PubMed ID: 8328165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of duration, frequency, and loudness upon the reproduction of temporal intervals.
    Deal LV; Oyer HJ
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1975; 1(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 1232079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulus range effects in temporal bisection by humans.
    Wearden JH; Ferrara A
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1996 Feb; 49(1):24-44. PubMed ID: 8901385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of procedures in "otometry": absolute versus equal-loudness judgments.
    Wit HP
    J Aud Res; 1978 Apr; 18(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 753825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.