These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

49 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7185815)

  • 1. Some effects of intermodulation distortion on speech intelligibility.
    Singer J
    J Aud Res; 1981 Oct; 21(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 7185815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of speech intelligibility in noise with the Hearing in Noise Test.
    Soli SD; Wong LL
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):356-61. PubMed ID: 18569108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Syllabic compression and speech intelligibility in hearing impaired listeners.
    Verschuure J; Dreschler WA; de Haan EH; van Cappellen M; Hammerschlag R; Maré MJ; Maas AJ; Hijmans AC
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():92-100. PubMed ID: 8153570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
    Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Compensation for coarticulation, /u/-fronting, and sound change in standard southern British: an acoustic and perceptual study.
    Harrington J; Kleber F; Reubold U
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 May; 123(5):2825-35. PubMed ID: 18529198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The consistency of sentence intelligibility across three types of signal distortion.
    Healy EW; Montgomery AA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):270-82. PubMed ID: 17463229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility.
    George EL; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1269-77. PubMed ID: 18681613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children.
    Yang W; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):922-33. PubMed ID: 19206869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dysarthric speech: a comparison of computerized speech recognition and listener intelligibility.
    Doyle PC; Leeper HA; Kotler AL; Thomas-Stonell N; O'Neill C; Dylke MC; Rolls K
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1997 Jul; 34(3):309-16. PubMed ID: 9239624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The noise-suppression capacity of the auditory analyzer for interfering speech in one's native and in an unknown language].
    Tatevosian GI
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1994; (2):14-7. PubMed ID: 7855991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of high-pass and of low-pass filtering upon the intelligibility of speech in white noise.
    Niederjohn RJ; Mliner DG
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jul; 22(3):189-99. PubMed ID: 7187668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences.
    Davis MH; Johnsrude IS; Hervais-Adelman A; Taylor K; McGettigan C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 May; 134(2):222-41. PubMed ID: 15869347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of training on naïve listeners' judgments of the speech intelligibility of children with severe-to-profound hearing loss.
    Ellis LW; Beltyukova SA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1114-23. PubMed ID: 18664708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of periodic masker interruption on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.
    Iyer N; Brungart DS; Simpson BD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1693. PubMed ID: 17927429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception.
    Villacorta VM; Perkell JS; Guenther FH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2306-19. PubMed ID: 17902866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of noise and distortion on speech quality judgments in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC; Harvey LO
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1150-64. PubMed ID: 17672661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.
    Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DECtalk and VeriVox: intelligibility, likeability, and rate preference differences for four listener groups.
    Von Berg S; Panorska A; Uken D; Qeadan F
    Augment Altern Commun; 2009 Mar; 25(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 19280420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perception of coarticulatory information in normal speech and dysarthria.
    Tjaden K; Sussman J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 49(4):888-902. PubMed ID: 16908883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.