These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7186501)

  • 1. Phonetic factors in the dichotic alignment of the Staggered Spondaic Word Test.
    Rudmin F
    J Aud Res; 1981 Oct; 21(4):247-54. PubMed ID: 7186501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dichotic alignment, phonetic, and language variables as predictors of SSW performance.
    Rudmin FW
    J Otolaryngol; 1984 Apr; 13(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 6726853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Speech tests: application in individuals with noise induced hearing loss].
    Moreira RR; Ferreira Junior M
    Pro Fono; 2004; 16(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 15609584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Normal adult performance on a temporally modified staggered spondaic word task.
    Matthies ML; Garstecki DC
    Scand Audiol; 1980; 9(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 7444329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phonetic processing areas revealed by sinewave speech and acoustically similar non-speech.
    Benson RR; Richardson M; Whalen DH; Lai S
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):342-53. PubMed ID: 16530428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A probabilistic framework for landmark detection based on phonetic features for automatic speech recognition.
    Juneja A; Espy-Wilson C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1154-68. PubMed ID: 18247915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of linguistic background on staggered spondaic word and dichotic consonant vowel scores.
    Keith RW; Katbamna B; Tawfik S; Smolak LH
    Br J Audiol; 1987 Feb; 21(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 3828581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the influence of interaural differences on temporal perception of noise bursts of different durations.
    Schimmel O; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):986-97. PubMed ID: 18247901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Experimental phonetic observations on speech audiometry].
    Doubek F
    Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd Laryngorhinol; 1966 Apr; 100(4):177-9. PubMed ID: 16114389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stimulus dominance in fused dichotic syllables: trouble for the category goodness hypothesis.
    Repp BH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Jan; 67(1):288-305. PubMed ID: 7354197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing the protracted lexical restructuring hypothesis: the effects of position and acoustic-phonetic clarity on sensitivity to mispronunciations in children and adults.
    Bowey JA; Hirakis E
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 Sep; 95(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 16546204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Dychotomic tests in Polish for speech audiometry part 1: preparing material for the tests].
    Wojnowski W; Obrebowski A; Pruszewicz A; Demenko G; Wiskirska-Woźnica B; Wika T; Komar D
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2006; 60(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 16989452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stimulus-dominance effects and lateral asymmetries for language in normal subjects and in patients with a single functional hemisphere.
    Di Stefano M; Marano E; Viti M
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Oct; 56(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 15380876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attentional modulation of the phonetic significance of acoustic cues.
    Gordon PC; Eberhardt JL; Rueckl JG
    Cogn Psychol; 1993 Jan; 25(1):1-42. PubMed ID: 8425384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word-learning tasks.
    Stager CL; Werker JF
    Nature; 1997 Jul; 388(6640):381-2. PubMed ID: 9237755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Segregation of unvoiced speech from nonspeech interference.
    Hu G; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1306-19. PubMed ID: 18681616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of practice on 8-10-yr-old children using the Staggered Spondaic Word Test.
    Minetti SB; McCartney JH
    J Aud Res; 1978 Oct; 18(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 756870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of lexical status on the phonetic categorization of speech in aphasia.
    Blumstein SE; Burton M; Baum S; Waldstein R; Katz D
    Brain Lang; 1994 Feb; 46(2):181-97. PubMed ID: 8137141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Natural boundaries in gap detection are related to categorical perception of stop consonants.
    Elangovan S; Stuart A
    Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):761-74. PubMed ID: 18769272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.