These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7186643)

  • 1. [Evaluation of a simplified method of preparation of the inoculum for making antibiograms with the ABAC system. Comparison with the standard method in 100 cases].
    Ricci E; De Michele MB; Di Giacomandrea D; Terzini A; Castronuovo A
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1982 Dec; 18(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 7186643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparison of the results of antibiotic sensitivity tests made with the ABAC method and the agar diffusion method].
    Orsi A; Simonetti T; Morgantetti F
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1981 Mar; 17(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 7313068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Further observations on a simplified method for the execution of antibiograms. Comparison with method of broth dilution (author's transl)].
    Miceli MD; Fontana P; La Mantia P; Mansueto S
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1981 Sep; 17(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 7343979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Triangular comparison of the agar diffusion method, the ABAC system and the Sensitre system for determination of bacterial sensitivity to aminoglycoside chemoantibiotics].
    Sala A; Raffaele L; Cappello P
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1981 Mar; 17(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 7313065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Determination of the antibiotic sensitivity of microbial strains by a new method: ABAC].
    Fourlinnie JC; Guffroy R
    Lille Med; 1979 Dec; 24(10):814-7. PubMed ID: 529968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Choice of criteria in the revision of the ABAC system for the determination of sensitivity to antibiotics].
    Nicolosi VM; Morgantetti F; Desiderio C; Geraci C; Lamicela L
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1981 Dec; 17(4):567-72. PubMed ID: 7347834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evaluation of a new system for simultaneous identification and antibiograms of enterobacteria from urine].
    Nicolosi VM; Morgantetti F; Desiderio C; Geraci C; Lamicela L; Gazzo G
    G Batteriol Virol Immunol; 1980; 73(7-12):281-93. PubMed ID: 7308618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Determination of sensitivity of rapid growing bacteria by the MS-2-system. A comparison with conventional methods (author's transl)].
    Wiebe C; Linzenmeier G
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1981 Dec; 251(2):237-47. PubMed ID: 7200305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparison of the Sensititre diagnostic system and the Bauer-Kirby test of sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents in agar, on bacterial strains isolated from urinary infections].
    Zitelli A; Marin V; Favaro M; Galiano F
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1982 Dec; 18(4):463-71. PubMed ID: 7186649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Antibiograms of pathogenic bacteria isolated from laboratory rabbits in Ibadan, Nigeria.
    Okewole EA; Olubunmi PA
    Lab Anim; 2008 Oct; 42(4):511-4. PubMed ID: 18840619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Indirect conductimetric assay of antibacterial activities.
    Sawai J; Doi R; Maekawa Y; Yoshikawa T; Kojima H
    J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2002 Nov; 29(5):296-8. PubMed ID: 12407467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Drug sensitivity test by disc-method; especially on inoculation method of bacteria by concentration 1 disc-method].
    Takami H; Numano S; Kobayashi M
    Rinsho Byori; 1970 Feb; 18(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 5462061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The inoculum effect: fact or artifact?
    Craig WA; Bhavnani SM; Ambrose PG
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2004 Dec; 50(4):229-30. PubMed ID: 15582294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A statistical method to evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of a standardised technique for the conduct of antibiograms on two species of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Venter BJ
    J S Afr Vet Assoc; 1989 Mar; 60(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 2724281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [On a simple method for freeing pathological materials from fungi for the purpose of making bacterial antibiograms].
    Scoles E; Sisti F
    Rass Int Clin Ter; 1966 Dec; 46(24):1341-2. PubMed ID: 4872444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Antibiotic sensitivity of germs isolated from cellulitis of dental origin in Senegal (results of a survey of 49 cases)].
    Dia-Tine S; Evrard L; Gentile B; Faty-Ndiaye C; Diallo B; Mboup N; Larroque G
    Dakar Med; 1993; 38(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 7882858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Reliability of the bacterial identification tests and of antibiotic sensitivity tests made with automatic methods].
    Goffi M; Somenzi P; Magliani W; Menozzi MG
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1981 Mar; 17(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 7313071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Antimicrobial drug therapy and microbial sensitivity tests--antibiotics and microbial sensitivity tests].
    Kanno H
    Rinsho Byori; 1997 Jul; Suppl 105():174-81. PubMed ID: 9379537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In-vitro efficacy of antibacterials against bacterial isolates from corneal ulcers.
    Bharathi MJ; Ramakrishnan R; Vasu S; Meenakshi R; Palaniappan R
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2002 Jun; 50(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 12194566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation of a rapid technique for antibiotic sensitivity testing using an MS-2 automate and blood culture medium].
    Flandrois JP; Carret G; Chomarat M
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1981; 39(5):285-8. PubMed ID: 7316253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.