These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7186862)
41. Four years' experience with the Lippes Loop as a method of family planning. Williams LL; Patterson AW West Indian Med J; 1971 Mar; 20(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 5556003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. [Reliability and danger of intrauterine pessary]. Philipp E; Luh W Zentralbl Gynakol; 1972 Nov; 94(46):1569-75. PubMed ID: 4646053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. [Intrauterine device and infertility: have the risks changed? Can an intrauterine device be used in a nulliparous woman?]. Quereux C Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2000 May; 28(5):412-4. PubMed ID: 10893888 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. [1-year experience with a new intrauterine device (TCu 200)]. Batár I; Veres L; Lampé L; Surányi S; Csobán G Orv Hetil; 1975 Jul; 116(27):1576-8. PubMed ID: 1143849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Six years experience with intrauterine contraceptive devices. Deyton RG N C Med J; 1971 Nov; 32(11):466-9. PubMed ID: 5288748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Experience with the use of intrauterine contraceptive devices. Nummi S; Ylöstalo P Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1968; 57(5):611-4. PubMed ID: 5731339 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Intravesical migration of intrauterine device resulting in pregnancy. Hoşcan MB; Koşar A; Gümüştaş U; Güney M Int J Urol; 2006 Mar; 13(3):301-2. PubMed ID: 16643632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The occurrence of pregnancy dispite the presence of Lippes' loop: a report of two cases. Ringrose CA Can Med Assoc J; 1967 Aug; 97(7):342-3. PubMed ID: 6068279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. An audit of intrauterine device usage and outcome in general practice. Presley AP Practitioner; 1980 Oct; 224(1348):1089-91. PubMed ID: 7220438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Natural history of contraceptive practice among postpartum loop acceptors. Wright NH Obstet Gynecol; 1969 Mar; 33(3):361-9. PubMed ID: 5776085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. [Experience with the Lippes D intrauterine contraceptive device]. Martínez JT; Fernández G; López A Rev Obstet Ginecol Venez; 1967; 27(1):159-74. PubMed ID: 5597925 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Acute neurovascular sequelae of intrauterine device insertion or removal. Conrad CC; Ghazi M; Kitay DZ J Reprod Med; 1973 Nov; 11(5):211-2. PubMed ID: 4768149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. [Effect of intrauterine contraceptives on the child-bearing function of women and the state of the children]. Skuia IIa; Andreeva EI; Silabriede MM Vopr Okhr Materin Det; 1975 Aug; 20(8):88-9. PubMed ID: 1179711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. [Ovarian pregnancy in a user of the lippes loop (clinical case)]. Arriagada J; Gayán P; Corbalán G; Klein F; Mayorga L; Aguila P Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1980; 45(3):122-5. PubMed ID: 7323355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Use of intrauterine device by nulliparous women. Prospective study and preliminary data]. Bastianelli C; Farris M; Lippa A; Lucantoni V; Valente A Minerva Ginecol; 1998 Jun; 50(6):231-3. PubMed ID: 9763814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [A new intrauterine device for the immediate puerperium. Technical description of its application and results]. García Roel R; Saldaña García RH; García Flores R Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1974 Aug; 36(214):135-41. PubMed ID: 4430449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]