130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7186904)
1. Comparison of Enteric-Tek with API 20E and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
Bruckner DA; Clark V; Martin WJ
J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Jan; 15(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 7186904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical evaluation of the MICRO-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems for identification of Enterobacteriacea.
Edberg SC; Atkinson B; Chambers C; Moore MH; Palumbo L; Zorzon CF; Singer JM
J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Aug; 10(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 389946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative evaluation of the Eiken and API 20E systems and conventional methods for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
Castillo CB; Bruckner DA
J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Oct; 20(4):754-7. PubMed ID: 6490860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of micro-ID and API 20E in rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
Gooch WM; Hill GA
J Clin Microbiol; 1982 May; 15(5):885-90. PubMed ID: 7047556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of micro-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems in identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
Aldridge KE; Gardner BB; Clark SJ; Matsen JM
J Clin Microbiol; 1978 Jun; 7(6):507-13. PubMed ID: 353065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the API rapid E four-hour system with the API 20E overnight system for the identification of routine clinical isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
Overman TL; Plumley D; Overman SB; Goodman NL
J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Apr; 21(4):542-5. PubMed ID: 3886691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using SIB and API kits to identify and biotype enterobacteria of different origin.
Kulinich LI; Fish NG; Mazitova OP; Dratvin SA; Birger MO
J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol; 1987; 31(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 3316379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of identification of Enterobacteriaceae by API 20E and Sensititre Autoidentification System.
Barr JG; Hogg GM; Smyth ET; Emmerson AM
J Clin Pathol; 1989 Jun; 42(6):649-52. PubMed ID: 2661593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of four rapid methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae from blood cultures.
Malloy PJ; Ducate MJ; Schreckenberger PC
J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Mar; 17(3):493-9. PubMed ID: 6841583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reevaluation of the API 20E identification system versus conventional biochemicals for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: a new look at an old product.
O'Hara CM; Rhoden DL; Miller JM
J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Jan; 30(1):123-5. PubMed ID: 1734043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae: evaluation of 3 commercial systems].
Sala A; Dore R; Raffaele L; Cappello P
Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1985 Jun; 21(2):214-24. PubMed ID: 4080964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the BBL Crystal Enteric/Nonfermenter kit for the identification of water-derived environmental Enterobacteriaceae.
Micklewright IJ; Sartory DP
Lett Appl Microbiol; 1995 Sep; 21(3):160-3. PubMed ID: 7576500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of two four-hour identification systems with atypical strains of Enterobacteriaceae.
Altwegg M
Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Dec; 2(6):529-33. PubMed ID: 6365536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rapid and automated identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the abbott MS-2 system and API-20E versus conventional methods.
Izard D; Savage C; Enayeh E; Leclerc H; Troonen H
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 May; 252(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 6750982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the automicrobic system with API, enterotube, micro-ID, micro-media systems, and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
Kelly MT; Latimer JM
J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Nov; 12(5):659-62. PubMed ID: 7024296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the four-hour rapid 20E system for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
Izard D; Husson MO; Vincent P; Leclerc H; Monget D; Boeufgras JM
J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Jul; 20(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 6378967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Time-motion and cost comparison study of micro-ID, API 20E, and conventional biochemical testing in identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
Bale MJ; Matsen JM
J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Dec; 14(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 6801085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of three methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
Appelbaum PC; Arthur RR; Parker ME; Shugar GL; von Kuster LC; Charache P
Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Apr; 1(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 6756905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the Quantum II and Rapid E identification systems.
Murray PR; Gauthier A; Niles A
J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Sep; 20(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 6386866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the Enteric-Tek system for identifying Enterobacteriaceae.
Esaias AO; Rhoden DL; Smith PB
J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Mar; 15(3):419-24. PubMed ID: 7042744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
