52 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7187433)
1. Lack of effect of contralateral speech discourse on auditory threshold response behavior.
Fulton RT; Meyer PA; Cooper SJ
J Aud Res; 1982 Apr; 22(2):131-42. PubMed ID: 7187433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of a contralateral masking stimulus on auditory response performance.
Sagharichi M; Fulton RT
J Aud Res; 1983 Apr; 23(2):77-93. PubMed ID: 6679550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
Cameron S; Dillon H
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of contralateral noise on 40-Hz and 80-Hz auditory steady-state responses.
Maki A; Kawase T; Kobayashi T
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):584-9. PubMed ID: 19550336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Audiometric evaluation of bilaterally fitted bone-anchored hearing aids.
Bosman AJ; Snik AF; van der Pouw CT; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
Audiology; 2001; 40(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 11465298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the relationship of stapedial contraction to central masking.
Youngblood J; Martin FN
J Aud Res; 1981 Jan; 21(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 7349870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Human auditory steady-state responses during sweeps of intensity.
Picton TW; van Roon P; John MS
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):542-57. PubMed ID: 17609615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Establishment of age-specific normative data for the canadian French version of the hearing in noise test for children.
Vaillancourt V; Laroche C; Giguère C; Soli SD
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):453-66. PubMed ID: 18349705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Central fatigue in a perstimulatory paradigm.
Grauer RA; Dunn BE
J Aud Res; 1980 Apr; 20(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 7345064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
Wong LL; Cheung C; Wong EC
Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of ambient acoustic noise on the auditory steady-state response thresholds in normally hearing adults.
Kei J; Smith D; Joseph S; Stopa J; Kang S; Darnell R
Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 17715465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
Summers V; Molis MR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of extended-range frequency-response amplification in hearing aids.
Forrester JI; Raffin MJ
J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 7187908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Learning effect observed for the speech reception threshold in interrupted noise with normal hearing listeners.
Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2008 Apr; 47(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 18389414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Bernstein JG; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
