These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

52 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7187433)

  • 21. Bone-conducted speech: intelligibility functions and threshold force levels for spondees.
    Beattie RC; Smiarowski RA
    Am J Otol; 1981 Oct; 3(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 7304720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Speech-in-noise intelligibility does not correlate with efferent olivocochlear reflex in humans with normal hearing.
    Wagner W; Frey K; Heppelmann G; Plontke SK; Zenner HP
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jan; 128(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 17851961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hearing aid evaluation: predicting speech gain from insertion gain.
    Dillon H
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Jun; 36(3):621-33. PubMed ID: 8331918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of presentation level on phoneme and sentence recognition in quiet by cochlear implant listeners.
    Donaldson GS; Allen SL
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):392-405. PubMed ID: 14534410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Monaural auditory adaptation of reaction times at .5, 1, and 3 kc/s.
    Davis JM; Weiler EM; Sandman DE
    J Aud Res; 1986 Oct; 26(4):261-6. PubMed ID: 3436925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of contralateral noise on the middle components of the averaged electroencephalic response.
    Gutnick HN; Goldstein R
    J Speech Hear Res; 1978 Dec; 21(4):613-24. PubMed ID: 745364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effects of alcohol on the acoustic Reflex Relaxation Index.
    Robinette MS; Alper RR; Brey RH
    J Aud Res; 1981 Oct; 21(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 7185810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of stimulus level on vocal suppression in neonates.
    Riccillo SC; Topping GE; Watterson T
    J Aud Res; 1984 Jul; 24(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 6545538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Comparative characteristics of the action of moderate levels of constant and interrupted noise on certain body functions].
    Oleshkevich LA
    Gig Sanit; 1973 Aug; 38(8):95-7. PubMed ID: 4770872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of presentation level on the Gaps-In-Noise (GIN) test.
    Weihing JA; Musiek FE; Shinn JB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Feb; 18(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 17402300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Spread-of-masking effects on pure tones and several speech stimuli.
    Wilson RH; Stream RW; Dirks DD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1973 Sep; 16(3):385-96. PubMed ID: 4744958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Adaptation to the delayed feedback of loud speech in an experiment lasting 3 days].
    Butollo WH; Maly J
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1967; 14(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 5616915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Threshold adaptation under normal conditions and with symptoms of fatigue of the auditory analyzer].
    Matsnev EI; Iakovleva IIa
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1967; 29(4):22-6. PubMed ID: 5605547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Prolonged effect of noise of moderate intensity on the functional state of the organism].
    Kozerenko OP; Matsnev EI; Miasnikov VI; Iakovleva IIa
    Izv Akad Nauk SSSR Biol; 1967; 4():527-36. PubMed ID: 6076376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Continuous noise interferes with work by masking auditory feedback and inner speech.
    Poulton EC
    Appl Ergon; 1976 Jun; 7(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 15677201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A direct comparison between lateralization and detection under conditions of antiphasic masking.
    Hafter ER; Bourbon WT; Blocker AS; Tucker A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1969 Dec; 46(6):1452-7. PubMed ID: 5361513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Further observations concerned with auditory fatigue during vocal and nonvocal speech activities.
    Luterman BF; Karlovich RS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1969 Aug; 46(2):403-8. PubMed ID: 5804111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Equivalent peak level: a threshold-independent speech-level measure.
    Brady PT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1968 Sep; 44(3):695-9. PubMed ID: 5679935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Speech behavior and egocentricity.
    MCPHERSON MW
    J Clin Psychol; 1956 Jul; 12(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 13332087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Lack of effect of contralateral speech discourse on auditory threshold response behavior.
    Fulton RT; Meyer PA; Cooper SJ
    J Aud Res; 1982 Apr; 22(2):131-42. PubMed ID: 7187433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.