These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7187633)

  • 21. Hemispheric processing of global form, local form, and texture.
    Kimchi R; Merhav I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1991 Apr; 76(2):133-47. PubMed ID: 1862728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dividing attention within and between hemispheres: testing a multiple resources approach to limited-capacity information processing.
    Friedman A; Polson MC; Dafoe CG; Gaskill SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Oct; 8(5):625-50. PubMed ID: 6218226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Are variations among right-handed individuals in perceptual asymmetries caused by characteristic arousal differences between hemispheres?
    Levy J; Heller W; Banich MT; Burton LA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1983 Jun; 9(3):329-59. PubMed ID: 6223975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of perceptual quality and visual field of probe stimulus presentation on memory search for letters.
    Hellige JB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1980 Nov; 6(4):639-51. PubMed ID: 6449535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of script direction on word processing modes in left and right visual fields.
    Siéroff E; Slama Y
    Laterality; 2018 Jul; 23(4):479-500. PubMed ID: 29141494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Semantic capabilities of the left and right cerebral hemispheres in categorization tasks: effects of verbal-pictorial presentation.
    Nieto A; Hernández S; Gonzalez-Feria L; Barroso J
    Neuropsychologia; 1990; 28(11):1175-86. PubMed ID: 2290492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cerebral lateralisation at different stages of facial processing.
    Parkin AJ; Williamson P
    Cortex; 1987 Mar; 23(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 3568709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Target detection in one visual field in the presence or absence of stimuli in the contralateral field by right- and left-handed subjects.
    Yund EW; Efron R; Nichols DR
    Brain Cogn; 1990 Jan; 12(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 2297429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Differential effects of concurrent letters on visual field differences in letter recognition.
    Hatta T
    Int J Neurosci; 1982 Sep; 17(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 7166476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Hemispheric differences in global and local processing dependent on exposure duration.
    Blanca MJ; Zalabardo C; García-Criado F; Siles R
    Neuropsychologia; 1994 Nov; 32(11):1343-51. PubMed ID: 7877743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Left visual field superiority in a letter-naming task for both left- and right-handers.
    Bashore TR; Nydegger RV; Miller H
    Cortex; 1982 Jul; 18(2):245-55. PubMed ID: 7128173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Hemispheric asymmetries for spatial frequency discrimination in a selective attention task.
    Proverbio AM; Zani A; Avella C
    Brain Cogn; 1997 Jul; 34(2):311-20. PubMed ID: 9220094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of a concurrent memory task on hemispheric asymmetries in categorization.
    Hass EJ; Whipple JL
    Brain Cogn; 1985 Jan; 4(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 4027053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Modes of word recognition in the left and right cerebral hemispheres.
    Ellis AW; Young AW; Anderson C
    Brain Lang; 1988 Nov; 35(2):254-73. PubMed ID: 3208072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hemispheric differences in processing handwritten cursive.
    Hellige JB; Adamson MM
    Brain Lang; 2007 Sep; 102(3):215-27. PubMed ID: 17157906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Investigating hemispheric specialization in a novel face-word Stroop task.
    Anes MD; Kruer JL
    Brain Lang; 2004 Apr; 89(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 15010245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Visual field differences in the magnitude of the Oppel-Kundt illusion vary with processing time.
    Rothwell B; Zaidel E
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Feb; 47(2):180-90. PubMed ID: 2304816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bugs and faces in the two visual fields: the analytic/holistic processing dichotomy and task sequencing.
    Bradshaw JL; Sherlock D
    Cortex; 1982 Jul; 18(2):211-25. PubMed ID: 7128171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hemispheric differences for identification of words and nonwords in Urdu-English bilinguals.
    Adamson MM; Hellige JB
    Neuropsychology; 2006 Mar; 20(2):232-48. PubMed ID: 16594784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.