These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7187912)

  • 1. Effects of white noise on the most comfortable level for speech with normal listeners.
    Beattie RC; Zentil A; Svihovec DA
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 7187912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comfortable loudness levels for speech: effects of signal-to-noise ratios and instructions.
    Beattie RC; Himes BE
    J Aud Res; 1984 Jul; 24(3):213-29. PubMed ID: 6545540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling speech intelligibility in quiet and noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Rhebergen KS; Lyzenga J; Dreschler WA; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1570-83. PubMed ID: 20329857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Loudness and the acoustic reflex: normal-hearing listeners.
    Keith RW
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1979; 4(4):152-6. PubMed ID: 422427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Loudness scaling for narrow band noise and speech signal].
    Prosser S; Rosignoli M
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1998 Dec; 18(6):373-8. PubMed ID: 10388150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acceptable range of speech level for both young and aged listeners in reverberant and quiet sound fields.
    Sato H; Sato H; Morimoto M; Ota R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1616. PubMed ID: 17927421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Loudness discomfort level for speech: comparison of two instructional sets for saturation sound pressure level selection.
    Beattie RC; Svihovec DA; Carmen RE; Kunkel HA
    Ear Hear; 1980; 1(4):197-205. PubMed ID: 7409356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comfortable speech listening levels: effects of competition and instruction.
    Beattie RC
    Am J Otol; 1982 Jan; 3(3):192-9. PubMed ID: 7055233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of speech presentation level on acceptance of noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Freyaldenhoven MC; Plyler PN; Thelin JW; Hedrick MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):878-85. PubMed ID: 17675593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Loudness and the acoustic reflex: cochlear-impaired listeners.
    Keith RW
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 511665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consonant identification in quiet and in noise with the normal and the sensorineural hearing-impaired.
    Givens GD; Jacobs-Condit L
    J Aud Res; 1981 Oct; 21(4):279-85. PubMed ID: 7186504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Most comfortable loudness for pure tones and speech in the presence of masking noise.
    Richards AM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Sep; 18(3):498-505. PubMed ID: 1186159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contribution of high-frequency information to the acceptance of background noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Plyler PN; Madix SG; Thelin JW; Johnston KW
    Am J Audiol; 2007 Dec; 16(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 18056883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hearing aid low frequency cut: effect on Mandarin tone and vowel perception in normal-hearing listeners.
    Zhang J; McPherson B
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(4):179-87. PubMed ID: 18446038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of the intelligibility for speech in real-life background noises for subjects with normal hearing.
    Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 18490862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region.
    Summers V; Cord MT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17672659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.