These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7188204)

  • 1. Duration of increment, magnitude estimation adaptation and a proposed loudness function.
    Weiler EM; Cobb F
    J Aud Res; 1982 Oct; 22(4):233-9. PubMed ID: 7188204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monaural and binaural adaptation in sequence: SDLB analogue?
    Weiler EM; Cobb F; Sandman D; Pederson L
    J Aud Res; 1985 Jul; 25(3):149-59. PubMed ID: 3842839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors affecting descending binaural loudness balances as a manifestation of adaptation.
    Young IM; Lowry LD; Menduke H
    J Aud Res; 1986 Jan; 26(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 3610992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of procedures in "otometry": absolute versus equal-loudness judgments.
    Wit HP
    J Aud Res; 1978 Apr; 18(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 753825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monaural auditory adaptation of reaction times at .5, 1, and 3 kc/s.
    Davis JM; Weiler EM; Sandman DE
    J Aud Res; 1986 Oct; 26(4):261-6. PubMed ID: 3436925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spectral loudness summation as a function of duration for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Verhey JL; Anweiler AK; Hohmann V
    Int J Audiol; 2006 May; 45(5):287-94. PubMed ID: 16717019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement of individual loudness functions by trisection of loudness ranges.
    Villchur E; Killion MC
    Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):693-703. PubMed ID: 18769270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ipsilateral loudness adaptation over multiple intensity levels.
    Weiler EM; Sandman DE; Janson-Pinto J; Dange AJ; Dember WN; Warm JS; Nelson WT
    J Gen Psychol; 2000 Oct; 127(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 11109999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Loudness adaptation measured by the simultaneous dichotic loudness balance technique differs between genders.
    D'Alessandro LM; Norwich KH
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 19027058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Magnitude estimates of loudness adaption at 60 dB SPL.
    Weiler EM; Sandman DE; Pederson LM
    Br J Audiol; 1981 Aug; 15(3):201-4. PubMed ID: 7296099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Loudness adaptation, when induced, is real.
    Canévet G; Scharf B; Botte MC
    Br J Audiol; 1983 Feb; 17(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 6860822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory adaptation: notes on power and parabolic curve fitting across intensity: II.
    Weiler EM; Sandman DE; Agnello JG; Balzer GK
    J Aud Res; 1985 Jan; 25(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 3836993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monaural loudness adaptation for middle-intensity middle-frequency signals: the importance of measurement technique.
    Tannen RS; Weiler EM; Warm JS; Dember WN; Simon JO
    J Gen Psychol; 2001 Oct; 128(4):385-99. PubMed ID: 11892887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Loudness growth of musically complex stimuli.
    Marshall L
    J Aud Res; 1980 Apr; 20(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 7345056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of pulse rate on thresholds and loudness of biphasic and alternating monophasic pulse trains in electrical hearing.
    van Wieringen A; Carlyon RP; Macherey O; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 220(1-2):49-60. PubMed ID: 16904278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Loudness reduction induced by a contralateral tone.
    Nieder B; Buus S; Cazals Y; Scharf B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):35-7. PubMed ID: 17614461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of phase duration and pulse rate on loudness and pitch percepts in the first auditory midbrain implant patients: Comparison to cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant results.
    Lim HH; Lenarz T; Joseph G; Battmer RD; Patrick JF; Lenarz M
    Neuroscience; 2008 Jun; 154(1):370-80. PubMed ID: 18384971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perstimulatory adaptation as measured by reaction time: asymmetry between 400 and 500 kc/s.
    Goldman T; Weiler EM; Davis JM
    J Aud Res; 1981 Jan; 21(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 7349865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.