These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Abortion: The high court has ruled. Fam Plann Perspect; 1973; 5(1):1. PubMed ID: 4805711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Teenage abortion in Germany: with reference to the legal system in the United States. Belling DW; Eberl C J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 12(2):475-502. PubMed ID: 8666732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rights of the pregnant child vs. rights of the unborn under the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Janoff AF Boston Univ Int Law J; 2004; 22(1):163-88. PubMed ID: 16514751 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Personhood: current legal views. Larson EJ Second Opin; 1990 Jul; (14):40-53. PubMed ID: 10105947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rights talk and its remedies: the jurisprudence of Mary Ann Glendon. Hagen JD America (NY); 2006 Jan 2-9; 194(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 16459378 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion 1981: the search for perspective. Healey JM Conn Med; 1981 Jul; 45(7):467. PubMed ID: 7249654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion 1980: the debate continues. Healey JM Conn Med; 1980 Sep; 44(9):605. PubMed ID: 7408487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recent developments in the abortion area. Scanlan AL Cathol Lawyer; 1975; 21(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 11661372 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court. Brown HO Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The worst of both worlds?: parental involvement requirements and the privacy rights of mature minors. O'Shaughnessy M Ohio State Law J; 1996; 57(5):1731-65. PubMed ID: 16086519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The legal impact of the Roe and Doe decisions. Granfield D Jurist; 1973; 33(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 11663427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Amniocentesis for sex identification. McCullough LB N Engl J Med; 1980 Feb; 302(9):524. PubMed ID: 7351992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion: history, opinions, and what's new in the United States. Jubb ED Can Bar J; 1973 Jul; 4(3):8-12. PubMed ID: 11663761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Roe v. Wade and the euthanasia debate. Bopp J; Coleson RE Issues Law Med; 1997; 12(4):343-54. PubMed ID: 9114604 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness. Ehrlich JS Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The minor's right of privacy: limitations on state action after Danforth and Carey. Siliciano JA Columbia Law Rev; 1977 Dec; 77(8):1216-46. PubMed ID: 10273154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What happens if Roe is overruled? Extraterritorial regulation of abortion by the states. Bradford CS Ariz Law Rev; 1993; 35(1):87-171. PubMed ID: 12645556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Supreme Court and abortion: 1. Upholding constitutional principles. Noonan JT Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Dec; 10(6):14-6. PubMed ID: 7461954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The class conflict over abortion. Skerry P Public Interest; 1978; (52):. PubMed ID: 11663974 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]