These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7190542)
1. A patient care review model to suit both hospitals and PSROs. Thompson RE Hospitals; 1980 Aug; 54(16):61-3. PubMed ID: 7190542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. PSROs--implications for hospitals. McMahon JA Hospitals; 1974 Jan; 48(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 4855639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. PSROs: origins, directions, and changing assumptions. Smits H Bull N Y Acad Med; 1982; 58(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 7052174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The PRO utilization and quality review process: an overview--Part I. Politser P Bull Am Coll Surg; 1989 May; 74(5):17-22. PubMed ID: 10303472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The relationship between the Professional Standards Review Organizations and the State Health Department. McGarvey MR Bull N Y Acad Med; 1982; 58(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 7052175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. HSAs and PSROs: can the odd couple learn to live together? Budetti PP Am J Health Plann; 1978 Jan; 3(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10305961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PRO objectives and quality criteria. Grimaldi PL; Micheletti JA Hospitals; 1985 Feb; 59(3):64-7. PubMed ID: 3881333 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The evolving scope of PROs. Interview by Jane Stein. Weiser RR Bus Health; 1987 Nov; 5(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 10284429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Review: feedback about practice patterns for measurable improvements in quality of care--a challenge for PROs under the Health Care Quality Improvement Program. Hayes RP; Ballard DJ Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1995; 3(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 10141395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost containment and the link to quality. VanderVeen LM Health Care Strateg Manage; 1988 Jan; 6(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 10286008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Health care regulation via PSRO: the management control system of concurrent stay review. Dittman DA Socioecon Issues Health; 1980; ():39-57. PubMed ID: 10309697 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Criteria and the PSRO program. Zelinger G; Stephens S QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1980 Aug; 6(8):16-9. PubMed ID: 6776468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The new economics of PSRO review: an uncertain future. Luecke RW; Freeman JK Hosp Financ Manage; 1981 Apr; 35(4):56-8, 60, 62. PubMed ID: 10273247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Communication with PSROs must be two-way. Ryan J Mich Hosp; 1979 Aug; 15(8):14-5. PubMed ID: 10273164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Quality assurance in United States hospitals]. Jessee WF Salud Publica Mex; 1990; 32(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 2367916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Utilization and quality control peer review organizations--a rose by any other name . . . ? Berg RN J Med Assoc Ga; 1982 Nov; 71(11):793-6. PubMed ID: 6890977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. PSROs to focus on use of hospital services. Smits H Hosp Peer Rev; 1979 Nov; 4(11):147. PubMed ID: 10273175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical review organizations: a model state immunity statute. Kopit WG; Shapiro LE; Eaton KB Group Pract; 1980 Apr; 29(4):17-20. PubMed ID: 10273186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. PSRO: current status of the professional standards review organization program. Ellis GL Am J Occup Ther; 1976 Jul; 30(6):370-5. PubMed ID: 945943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The economics of delegated vs. nondelegated PSRO review. Luecke RW Hosp Financ Manage; 1980 Jul; 34(7):24-30. PubMed ID: 10273228 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]