These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 719120)

  • 1. A likelihood ratio statistic for testing goodness of fit with randomly censored data.
    Turnbull BW; Weiss L
    Biometrics; 1978 Sep; 34(3):367-75. PubMed ID: 719120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of item response theory models for sparse 2 tables.
    Cai L; Maydeu-Olivares A; Coffman DL; Thissen D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 May; 59(Pt 1):173-94. PubMed ID: 16709285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Bayesian chi-squared goodness-of-fit test for censored data models.
    Cao J; Moosman A; Johnson VE
    Biometrics; 2010 Jun; 66(2):426-34. PubMed ID: 19645701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On testing departure from the binomial and multinomial assumptions.
    Paul SR; Liang KY; Self SG
    Biometrics; 1989 Mar; 45(1):231-6. PubMed ID: 2720053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the chi-square approximation to the exact distribution of goodness-of-fit statistics in multinomial models with composite hypotheses.
    García-Pérez MA; Núñez-Antón VA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2004 May; 57(Pt 1):73-96. PubMed ID: 15171802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A nonparametric smoothing method for assessing GEE models with longitudinal binary data.
    Lin KC; Chen YJ; Shyr Y
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4428-39. PubMed ID: 18613210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sample size determination for comparing several survival curves with unequal allocations.
    Halabi S; Singh B
    Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(11):1793-815. PubMed ID: 15160409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Likelihood ratio testing of variance components in the linear mixed-effects model using restricted maximum likelihood.
    Morrell CH
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1560-8. PubMed ID: 9883552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing the fit of a regression model via score tests in random effects models.
    le Cessie S; van Houwelingen HC
    Biometrics; 1995 Jun; 51(2):600-14. PubMed ID: 7662848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Type I errors and power of the parametric bootstrap goodness-of-fit test: full and limited information.
    Tollenaar N; Mooijaart A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):271-88. PubMed ID: 14633336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating the pi* goodness of fit index for finite mixtures of item response models.
    Revuelta J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):93-113. PubMed ID: 18482477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ascertainment and goodness of fit of variance component models for pedigree data.
    Boehnke M; Lange K
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1984; 147():173-92. PubMed ID: 6547532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of the volume of red blood cells: application of the expectation-maximization algorithm to grouped data from the doubly-truncated lognormal distribution.
    McLaren CE; Brittenham GM; Hasselblad V
    Biometrics; 1986 Mar; 42(1):143-58. PubMed ID: 3719051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of procedures for testing the equality of survival distributions.
    Joe H; Koziol JA; Petkau AJ
    Biometrics; 1981 Jun; 37(2):327-40. PubMed ID: 7272418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Likelihood ratio tests in behavioral genetics: problems and solutions.
    Dominicus A; Skrondal A; Gjessing HK; Pedersen NL; Palmgren J
    Behav Genet; 2006 Mar; 36(2):331-40. PubMed ID: 16474914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exact goodness-of-fit tests for shape-scale families and type II censoring.
    Bagdonavičius VB; Levuliene RJ; Nikulin MS
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2013 Jul; 19(3):413-35. PubMed ID: 23483381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testing goodness of fit of parametric models for censored data.
    Nysen R; Aerts M; Faes C
    Stat Med; 2012 Sep; 31(21):2374-85. PubMed ID: 22714389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A concordance test for independence in the presence of censoring.
    Oakes D
    Biometrics; 1982 Jun; 38(2):451-5. PubMed ID: 7052151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. General right censoring and its impact on the analysis of survival data.
    Lagakos SW
    Biometrics; 1979 Mar; 35(1):139-56. PubMed ID: 497332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing a genetic equilibrium across strata.
    Nam JM
    Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Mar; 61(Pt 2):163-70. PubMed ID: 9177123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.