These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 719120)

  • 21. A nonparametric test for association with censored data.
    O'Brien PC
    Biometrics; 1978 Jun; 34(2):243-50. PubMed ID: 667272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Testing for the presence of immune or cured individuals in censored survival data.
    Maller RA; Zhou S
    Biometrics; 1995 Dec; 51(4):1197-205. PubMed ID: 8589219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Goodness-of-fit testing using components based on marginal frequencies of multinomial data.
    Reiser M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):331-60. PubMed ID: 17535483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Rank analysis of covariance with right-censored data.
    Woolson RF; Lachenbruch PA
    Biometrics; 1983 Sep; 39(3):727-33. PubMed ID: 6652205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Semiparametric analysis of survival data with left truncation and dependent right censoring.
    Jiang H; Fine JP; Chappell R
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):567-75. PubMed ID: 16011706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The use of a correlated binomial model for the analysis of certain toxicological experiments.
    Kupper LL; Haseman JK
    Biometrics; 1978 Mar; 34(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 564719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Detection of two-component mixtures of lognormal distributions in grouped, doubly truncated data: analysis of red blood cell volume distributions.
    McLaren CE; Wagstaff M; Brittenham GM; Jacobs A
    Biometrics; 1991 Jun; 47(2):607-22. PubMed ID: 1912264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Statistical evaluation of mathematical models for microbial growth.
    López S; Prieto M; Dijkstra J; Dhanoa MS; France J
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 Nov; 96(3):289-300. PubMed ID: 15454319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quantification of variability and uncertainty for censored data sets and application to air toxic emission factors.
    Zhao Y; Frey HC
    Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):1019-34. PubMed ID: 15357825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Goodness-of-fit tests for GEE modeling with binary responses.
    Barnhart HX; Williamson JM
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):720-9. PubMed ID: 9629652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Age-specific models of mortality and tumor onset for historical control animals in the National Toxicology Program's carcinogenicity experiments.
    Portier CJ; Hedges JC; Hoel DG
    Cancer Res; 1986 Sep; 46(9):4372-8. PubMed ID: 3731095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The graphical method for goodness of fit test in the inverse Weibull distribution based on multiply type-II censored samples.
    Kang SB; Han JT
    Springerplus; 2015; 4():768. PubMed ID: 26688782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Power calculation for a score test in the dependent censoring model.
    Lee SY
    Stat Med; 1996 May; 15(10):1049-58. PubMed ID: 8783441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An approximate likelihood procedure for censored data.
    Oakes D
    Biometrics; 1986 Mar; 42(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 3719053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Testing for the presence of cured patients: a simulation study.
    Peng Y; Dear KB; Carriere KC
    Stat Med; 2001 Jun; 20(12):1783-96. PubMed ID: 11406841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessing the validity of a statistical distribution: some illustrative examples from dermatological research.
    Sürücü B; Koç E
    Clin Exp Dermatol; 2008 May; 33(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 18093239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Application of the pi* goodness-of-fit index to latent structure models].
    Revuelta J; Kessel D
    Psicothema; 2007 May; 19(2):322-8. PubMed ID: 17425905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Global goodness-of-fit tests in logistic regression with sparse data.
    Kuss O
    Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3789-801. PubMed ID: 12483767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Likelihood approaches to the non-parametric two-sample problem for right-censored data.
    Troendle JF; Yu KF
    Stat Med; 2006 Jul; 25(13):2284-98. PubMed ID: 16217854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The score test for independence in R x C contingency tables with missing data.
    Lipsitz SR; Fitzmaurice GM
    Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):751-62. PubMed ID: 8672711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.