These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7193922)
41. Can the psro's be cost effective? A study of the effect of the Commonwealth Health Agencies monitoring program on the length of stay of Medicaid patients in Massachusetts. Fulchiero A; Miller S; Foley CR; Ballantine HT; Amorosino CS N Engl J Med; 1978 Sep; 299(11):574-80. PubMed ID: 98710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. PRO objectives and quality criteria. Grimaldi PL; Micheletti JA Hospitals; 1985 Feb; 59(3):64-7. PubMed ID: 3881333 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Using claims data to monitor hospital utilization. Saad AN; Andrews RW; Griffith JR Inquiry; 1993; 30(4):447-54. PubMed ID: 8288407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Foundation for medical care control of hospital utilization: CHAP--a PSRO prototype. Brian E N Engl J Med; 1973 Apr; 288(17):878-82. PubMed ID: 4571246 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. The appropriateness evaluation protocol: a technique for assessing unnecessary days of hospital care. Gertman PM; Restuccia JD Med Care; 1981 Aug; 19(8):855-71. PubMed ID: 7196975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Toward effective hospital utilization management. Ten lessons from case studies. Smith DG; Perry BW Am J Med Qual; 1992; 7(4):125-9. PubMed ID: 1472877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Non-delegated utilization review offers control and objectivity. Fine A Contract Healthc; 1988 Jun; ():23. PubMed ID: 10290598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. New criteria cut PSRO cost and length of stay. LaViolette S Mod Healthc; 1979 May; 9(5):42, 46-7. PubMed ID: 571038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Generalizing the plurality method for forming hospital service areas. Rising WR Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1993; 1(4):199-204. PubMed ID: 10135635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Study provides regional comparisons of utilization data. Data Strateg Benchmarks; 1998 May; 2(5):77-8. PubMed ID: 10345376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Utilization rates vary based on HMO ownership, finds study of comparative hospital data. Data Strateg Benchmarks; 1997 Aug; 1(2):29-30, 17. PubMed ID: 10345332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The impact of a cybernetic control system on inappropriate admissions. Studnicki J; Stevens CE QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1984 Oct; 10(10):304-11. PubMed ID: 6438575 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Identifying and managing inappropriate hospital utilization: a policy synthesis. Payne SM Health Serv Res; 1987 Dec; 22(5):709-69. PubMed ID: 3121538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The controversial PSRO program: delegation of review authorization. Part II. Weissburg C; Waxman JM Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1981; 14(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 10273237 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. How one hospital gained PSRO delegated review status. Stukalin RL; Pomrinse SD Hosp Med Staff; 1976 Dec; 5(12):1-5. PubMed ID: 10273023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Going after favorable PRO determinations. Gosfield AG Cost Containment; 1985 Oct; 7(19):3-6. PubMed ID: 10273714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. The relationship between the Professional Standards Review Organizations and the State Health Department. McGarvey MR Bull N Y Acad Med; 1982; 58(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 7052175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparison of inpatient utilization to optimal standards. Dymowski RJ Manag Care Q; 1997; 5(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 10164648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Impact of socioeconomic status on health care utilization: factors influencing length of stay. Weingarten JP; Clay JC; Heckert DA J Health Hum Serv Adm; 1997; 19(4):384-409. PubMed ID: 10175519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]