These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7195653)
21. Utilization and quality control peer review organizations--a rose by any other name . . . ? Berg RN J Med Assoc Ga; 1982 Nov; 71(11):793-6. PubMed ID: 6890977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Quality Assurance Act could 'watch' HHAs. Home Health J; 1986 Mar; 7(3):4, 8. PubMed ID: 10300707 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Refresher education policy: results of a survey. Polatajko HJ; Wright C; Clancy P; LeBlanc M; Vanhook M Can J Occup Ther; 1987 Feb; 54(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 10280687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Costs or quality: what do the watchdogs watch? Heinz J Internist; 1986 Jul; 27(6):10, 12. PubMed ID: 10301021 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Continuing education and the geographically isolated therapist. Harvey LM Can J Occup Ther; 1983 Oct; 50(4):125-32. PubMed ID: 10263680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Working with the PRO. Foundation for Health Care Evaluation. Minn Med; 1989 May; 72(5):287-9. PubMed ID: 2659957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. WIPRO clarifies changes to quality review process. Wis Med J; 1993 Aug; 92(8):479. PubMed ID: 8237040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Peer review in occupational therapy. Ostrow PC QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1977 Jun; 3(6):12-8. PubMed ID: 407528 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Communities of practice: A means to support occupational therapists' continuing professional development. A literature review. Barry M; Kuijer-Siebelink W; Nieuwenhuis L; Scherpbier-de Haan N Aust Occup Ther J; 2017 Apr; 64(2):185-193. PubMed ID: 27704565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Pro third scope of work: two major changes. Ponder S Colo Med; 1989 Nov; 86(17):344-5. PubMed ID: 2680235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. An interview with Peter Vaill. Interview by Jeptha Dalston and Lawrence Prybil. Vaill P J Health Adm Educ; 1993; 11(2):199-219; discussion 221-33. PubMed ID: 10128425 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The benefits of continuing education online. Pink MM Rehab Manag; 2010 Mar; 23(2):32-3. PubMed ID: 20540283 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. How physicians can avoid problems with the PRO. Ponder S Colo Med; 1989 Dec; 86(18):387-8. PubMed ID: 2689059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Peer review, hearing requirements, and antitrust: maximizing Federal Health Care Quality Improvement Act compliance and immunity. Snelson EA J Med Assoc Ga; 1992 Sep; 81(9):495-7. PubMed ID: 1402428 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A busy practitioner's approach to evidence-based practice. Corcoran M Am J Occup Ther; 2006; 60(2):127-8. PubMed ID: 16596915 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Medical review organizations: a model state immunity statute. Kopit WG; Shapiro LE; Eaton KB Group Pract; 1980 Apr; 29(4):17-20. PubMed ID: 10273186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Medicare program implements fourth "scope of work" for peer review. Manning MM Health Care Law Newsl; 1993 Jul; 8(7):13-6. PubMed ID: 10126730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]