These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7199591)

  • 1. A comparison of triceps skinfold and upper arm circumference measurements taken in standard and supine positions.
    Jensen TG; Dudrick SJ; Johnston DA
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1981; 5(6):519-21. PubMed ID: 7199591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of upper arm measurements used in nutritional assessment.
    Burgert SL; Anderson CF
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1979 Oct; 32(10):2136-42. PubMed ID: 484532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of triceps skinfold values as measured by the plastic McGaw caliper and the Lange caliper.
    Burgert SL; Anderson CF
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1979 Jul; 32(7):1531-3. PubMed ID: 453067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Anthropometric and nutritional study in young adults. Evaluation of submandibular skinfold thickness].
    Fleta Zaragozano J; Moreno Aznar L; Rodríguez García L; Rodríguez Martínez G; Lario Elboj A
    Nutr Hosp; 1999; 14(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10361811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Upper arm anthropometric norms in elderly white subjects.
    Falciglia G; O'Connor J; Gedling E
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1988 May; 88(5):569-74. PubMed ID: 3367013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of calf circumference measurement as an anthropometric tool to monitor nutritional status in elderly inpatients.
    Portero-McLellan KC; Staudt C; Silva FR; Delbue Bernardi JL; Baston Frenhani P; Leandro Mehri VA
    J Nutr Health Aging; 2010 Apr; 14(4):266-70. PubMed ID: 20305992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Upper arm measurements of healthy neonates comparing ultrasonography and anthropometric methods.
    Pereira-da-Silva L; Veiga Gomes J; Clington A; Videira-Amaral JM; Bustamante SA
    Early Hum Dev; 1999 Mar; 54(2):117-28. PubMed ID: 10213290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anthropometric measurements and their interpretation: principles, practices, and problems.
    Gray GE; Gray LK
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1980 Nov; 77(5):534-9. PubMed ID: 6776174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New norms of upper limb fat and muscle areas for assessment of nutritional status.
    Frisancho AR
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1981 Nov; 34(11):2540-5. PubMed ID: 6975564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating upper arm anthropometric measurements.
    Bishop CW; Ritchey SJ
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1984 Mar; 84(3):330-5. PubMed ID: 6699326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. UAE population reference standard charts for body mass index and skinfold thickness, at ages 0-18 years.
    Abdulrazzaq YM; Nagelkerke N; Moussa MA
    Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2011 Nov; 62(7):692-702. PubMed ID: 21568821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship of arm girth measurements with roentgenogrammetric and caliper measurements of subcutaneous fat at triceps and biceps in adult male volunteers.
    Singh R
    Z Morphol Anthropol; 1967; 59(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 5607814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring waist circumference in disabled adults.
    Waninge A; Ligthart KA; Kramer J; Hoeve S; van der Schans CP; Haisma HH
    Res Dev Disabil; 2010; 31(3):839-47. PubMed ID: 20227242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of an anthropometric estimate of the muscle and bone area in a transversal cross-section of the arm.
    de Koning FL; Binkhorst RA; Kauer JM; Thijssen HO
    Int J Sports Med; 1986 Oct; 7(5):246-9. PubMed ID: 3793331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reference values for arm muscle area, arm fat area, subscapular skinfold thickness, and sum of skinfold thicknesses for American adults.
    Bishop CW
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1984; 8(5):515-22. PubMed ID: 6541716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How valid are our reference standards of nutrition?
    Thuluvath PJ; Triger DR
    Nutrition; 1995; 11(6):731-3. PubMed ID: 8719130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Body composition assessed on the basis of arm circumference and triceps skinfold thickness: a new index validated in children by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Rolland-Cachera MF; Brambilla P; Manzoni P; Akrout M; Sironi S; Del Maschio A; Chiumello G
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1997 Jun; 65(6):1709-13. PubMed ID: 9174464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of body fat distribution measurements. The ARIC Study baseline cohort results. Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.
    Ferrario M; Carpenter MA; Chambless LE
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1995 Jul; 19(7):449-57. PubMed ID: 8520633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The importance of the measurement of the circumference of arm, arm muscle area and skinfold thickness during puberty.
    Derman O; Yalcin SS; Kanbur NO; Kinik E
    Int J Adolesc Med Health; 2002; 14(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 12467194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Generational changes in the growth of children from Maribor and Slovenia.
    Bigec M
    Coll Antropol; 2013 May; 37 Suppl 2():197-209. PubMed ID: 23914508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.