These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions. Haas-Wilson D J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Confidential reproductive health services for minors: the potential impact of mandated parental involvement for contraception. Jones RK; Boonstra H Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2004; 36(5):182-91. PubMed ID: 15519960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effectiveness of family planning clinics in serving adolescents. Kisker EE Fam Plann Perspect; 1984; 16(5):212-8. PubMed ID: 6500020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Legislating family relationships. Gleeson K ZPG Report; 1991 Sep; 23(4):7. PubMed ID: 12284469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Parent-child relations among minor females attending U.S. family planning clinics. Jones RK; Singh S; Purcell A Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2005 Dec; 37(4):192-201. PubMed ID: 16380365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion services in the United States, 1979 and 1980. Henshaw SK; Forrest JD; Sullivan E; Tietze C Fam Plann Perspect; 1982; 14(1):5-8, 10-5. PubMed ID: 7037447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Legislation on contraception and abortion for adolescents. Roemer R Stud Fam Plann; 1985; 16(5):241-51. PubMed ID: 4060209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Administrative, counseling and medical practices in National Abortion Federation facilities. Landy U; Lewit S Fam Plann Perspect; 1982; 14(5):257-62. PubMed ID: 6926971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A technical knockout for parental notification. Fam Plann Perspect; 1987; 19(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 3556537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adolescent abortion and parental notification: evidence for the importance of family functioning on the perceived quality of parental involvement in U.S. families. Griffin-Carlson MS; Schwanenflugel PJ J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 1998 May; 39(4):543-53. PubMed ID: 9599782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fertility-related state laws enacted in 1981. Donovan P Fam Plann Perspect; 1982; 14(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 7047208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Supporting teenagers' use of contraceptives: a comparison of clinic services. Herceg-Baron R; Furstenberg FF; Shea J; Harris KM Fam Plann Perspect; 1986; 18(2):61-6. PubMed ID: 3792524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Missouri's parental consent law and teen pregnancy outcomes. Pierson VH Women Health; 1995; 22(3):47-58. PubMed ID: 7638977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A profile of the adolescent male family planning client. Brindis C; Boggess J; Katsuranis F; Mantell M; McCarter V; Wolfe A Fam Plann Perspect; 1998; 30(2):63-6, 88. PubMed ID: 9561870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New abortion laws introduce informed and parental consent. Family Plan World; 1991; 1(2):25. PubMed ID: 12284517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The costs and benefits of government expenditures for family planning programs. Chamie M; Henshaw SK Fam Plann Perspect; 1981; 13(3):117-8, 120-4. PubMed ID: 6788597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]