BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7202880)

  • 41. X-ray department gets cost-effective equipment, already has the system to keep it in perfect shape.
    Bernardi R
    Cost Containment; 1982 Jun; 4(11):6. PubMed ID: 10255905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The effect of performance standards on productivity among medical record department employees.
    Stich EK
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1990 Aug; 61(8):44-8. PubMed ID: 10105672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. In the radiology department trim costs with two management tools.
    Conine TA; Aders DM
    Hosp Financ Manage; 1980 Sep; 34(9):28-31, 34-5. PubMed ID: 10248664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Word processing: productivity measurement.
    Vlazny J
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Sep; 4(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 10262548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. An instrument cost model.
    Mozdzen JJ
    Pathologist; 1986 Dec; 40(12):14-8. PubMed ID: 10279903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Cutting hospital waste.
    Ala Med; 1983 Jul; 53(1):19-20. PubMed ID: 6624631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Is that new instrument a winner?
    Stafford AC
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1986 Apr; 18(4):24-8. PubMed ID: 10317714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Holding down equipment maintenance costs (while improving patient throughput and employee morale).
    Kelly JF
    Appl Radiol; 1986; 15(1):34-7, 40. PubMed ID: 10286574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The medical record department's impact on hospital revenue.
    Fox LA
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1986 Dec; 7(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 10312383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. How to know when to switch to microfilm.
    Rymer JE
    OH; 1976 Apr; 20(4):10-3. PubMed ID: 10246430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. AMRA responds to PRO copying cost issue.
    Banach J
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1988 Jul; 59(7):18-9. PubMed ID: 10287803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. PPS transfer rules have consequences for medical records.
    Burda D
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1984 Jul; 55(7):22-7. PubMed ID: 10310700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Acquisition alternatives for capital equipment.
    Burrows SB
    Pathologist; 1983 May; 37(5):326-8. PubMed ID: 10261179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. '83 hospital spending by department.
    Med Mark Media; 1984 Dec; 19(12):86. PubMed ID: 10269141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The CPA's review of the medical record department for a certified financial audit.
    Harsh MA; Bernstein KR
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1986 Dec; 7(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 10285937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Cutting the cost of RT supplies: a group purchasing plan.
    Marshall M
    Respir Ther; 1981; 11(3):107-9. PubMed ID: 10252534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Determining productivity and unit costs in a bacteriology laboratory.
    Gopaul D; Botz CK
    Can J Med Technol; 1986 Jun; 48(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 10311609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Financial questions arise from definition change.
    Stanton M
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1984 Jul; 55(7):27-8. PubMed ID: 10310701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Computer technology advances will help hospitals to compete.
    Carter K
    Mod Healthc; 1985 Nov; 15(24):90, 92. PubMed ID: 10275646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Efficient and effective abstracting: patient information reporting system is the answer.
    Copeland B
    Comput Hosp; 1981; 2(4):26-8. PubMed ID: 10253389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.