These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7207415)

  • 1. A formalism for calculation of absorbed dose to a medium from photon and electron beams.
    Loevinger R
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 7207415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
    Tailor RC; Hanson WF
    Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recommendations for clinical electron beam dosimetry: supplement to the recommendations of Task Group 25.
    Gerbi BJ; Antolak JA; Deibel FC; Followill DS; Herman MG; Higgins PD; Huq MS; Mihailidis DN; Yorke ED; Hogstrom KR; Khan FM
    Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3239-79. PubMed ID: 19673223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
    Araki F; Kubo HD
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The calibration and use of plane-parallel ionization chambers for dosimetry of electron beams: an extension of the 1983 AAPM protocol report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 39.
    Almond PR; Attix FH; Humphries LJ; Kubo H; Nath R; Goetsch S; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 1994 Aug; 21(8):1251-60. PubMed ID: 7799867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The advantages of absorbed-dose calibration factors.
    Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(5):1227-39. PubMed ID: 1435604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monte Carlo study of the depth-dependent fluence perturbation in parallel-plate ionization chambers in electron beams.
    Zink K; Czarnecki D; Looe HK; von Voigts-Rhetz P; Harder D
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111707. PubMed ID: 25370621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Absorbed-dose beam quality conversion factors for cylindrical chambers in high energy photon beams.
    Seuntjens JP; Ross CK; Shortt KR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2000 Dec; 27(12):2763-79. PubMed ID: 11190960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new approach to electron-beam reference dosimetry.
    Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 1998 Mar; 25(3):310-20. PubMed ID: 9547498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The characterization of the Advanced Markus ionization chamber for use in reference electron dosimetry in the UK.
    Pearce J; Thomas R; Dusautoy A
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 51(3):473-83. PubMed ID: 16424576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of the AAPM "Protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams" with currently used protocols.
    Hunt MA; Malik S; Thomason C; Masterson ME
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(6):806-13. PubMed ID: 6439991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Calibration of photon and electron beams with an extrapolation chamber.
    Zankowski CE; Podgorsak EB
    Med Phys; 1997 Apr; 24(4):497-503. PubMed ID: 9127299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Positioning of a plane-parallel ionization chamber in clinical electron beams and the impact on perturbation factors.
    Zink K; Wulff J
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(8):2421-35. PubMed ID: 19336840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An empirical method for the determination of wall perturbation factors for parallel-plate chambers in high-energy electron beams.
    McEwen M; Palmans H; Williams A
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5167-81. PubMed ID: 17019031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the wall perturbation correction for a parallel-plate NACP-02 chamber in clinical electron beams.
    Zink K; Wulff J
    Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):1045-54. PubMed ID: 21452742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A formulation for high-energy photon and electron beam dosimetry.
    Shiragai A
    Phys Med Biol; 1991 May; 36(5):633-42. PubMed ID: 2068228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microionization chamber air-kerma calibration coefficients as a function of photon energy for x-ray spectra in the range of 20-250 kVp relative to 60Co.
    Snow JR; Micka JA; DeWerd LA
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041711. PubMed ID: 23556881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The protocols and codes of practice used for the determination of absorbed dose in megavoltage photon and electron beams.
    Weatherburn H; Nisbet A
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1991; 19(2-3):147-80. PubMed ID: 1769240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advances in the determination of absorbed dose to water in clinical high-energy photon and electron beams using ionization chambers.
    Huq MS; Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Feb; 49(4):R49-104. PubMed ID: 15005158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.