These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7207415)

  • 21. Ionization chamber-based reference dosimetry of intensity modulated radiation beams.
    Bouchard H; Seuntjens J
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2454-65. PubMed ID: 15487725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Charge collection efficiency in ionization chambers exposed to electron beams with high dose per pulse.
    Laitano RF; Guerra AS; Pimpinella M; Caporali C; Petrucci A
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(24):6419-36. PubMed ID: 17148826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Verification of absorbed doses determined with thimble and parallel-plate ionization chambers in clinical electron beams using ferrous sulphate dosimetry.
    Van der Plaetsen A; Seuntjens J; Thierens H; Vynckier S
    Med Phys; 1994 Jan; 21(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 8164587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of protocols for external beam radiotherapy beam calibrations.
    Saeed Al-Ahbabi S; Bradley DA; Beyomi M; Alkatib Z; Adhaheri S; Darmaki M; Nisbet A
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2012 Jul; 70(7):1331-6. PubMed ID: 22608983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A theoretical re-examination of Spencer-Attix cavity theory.
    Bouchard H
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(11):3333-58. PubMed ID: 22572534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perturbation correction factors for the NACP-02 plane-parallel ionization chamber in water in high-energy electron beams.
    Verhaegen F; Zakikhani R; Dusautoy A; Palmans H; Bostock G; Shipley D; Seuntjens J
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(5):1221-35. PubMed ID: 16481689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparing calibration methods of electron beams using plane-parallel chambers with absorbed-dose to water based protocols.
    Stewart KJ; Seuntjens JP
    Med Phys; 2002 Mar; 29(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 11929010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Measured overall perturbation factors at depths greater than dmax for ionization chambers in electron beams.
    Reft CS; Kuchnir FT
    Med Phys; 1999 Feb; 26(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 10076976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effective point of measurement for parallel plate and cylindrical ion chambers in megavoltage electron beams.
    von Voigts-Rhetz P; Czarnecki D; Zink K
    Z Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 24(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 24418322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bragg-Gray theory and ion chamber dosimetry for photon beams.
    Ma CM; Nahum AE
    Phys Med Biol; 1991 Apr; 36(4):413-28. PubMed ID: 1904583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy photon beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Andreo P
    Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 11213922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Calibration and use of plane-parallel ionization chambers for the determination of absorbed dose in electron beams.
    Mattsson LO; Johansson KA; Svensson H
    Acta Radiol Oncol; 1981; 20(6):385-99. PubMed ID: 6278862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Study of the effective point of measurement for ion chambers in electron beams by Monte Carlo simulation.
    Wang LL; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):2034-42. PubMed ID: 19610292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Determination of absorbed dose in high-energy electron and photon radiation by means of an uncalibrated ionization chamber.
    Klevenhagen SC
    Phys Med Biol; 1991 Feb; 36(2):239-53. PubMed ID: 2008449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison between TG-51 and TG-21: Calibration of photon and electron beams in water using cylindrical chambers.
    Cho SH; Lowenstein JR; Balter PA; Wells NH; Hanson WF
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2000; 1(3):108-15. PubMed ID: 11674825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Calibration of high-energy photon and electron beams for radiotherapy using AAPM 1983 and IAEA 1987 dosimetry protocols.
    Huq MS; Agostinelli AG; Nath R
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(2 Pt 1):293-8. PubMed ID: 8497213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A dosimetric intercomparison of electron beams in UK radiotherapy centres.
    Nisbet A; Thwaites DI
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Dec; 42(12):2393-409. PubMed ID: 9434296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Monte Carlo calculations of electron beam quality conversion factors for several ion chamber types.
    Muir BR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111701. PubMed ID: 25370615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. kQ factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in clinical proton beams.
    Vatnitsky SM; Siebers JV; Miller DW
    Med Phys; 1996 Jan; 23(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 8700030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An EGSnrc Monte Carlo study of the microionization chamber for reference dosimetry of narrow irregular IMRT beamlets.
    Capote R; Sánchez-Doblado F; Leal A; Lagares JI; Arráns R; Hartmann GH
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2416-22. PubMed ID: 15487721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.