These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7208248)

  • 1. Three-stimulus procedures in olfactory psychophysics: an experimental comparison of Thurstone-Ura and three-alternative forced-choice models of signal detection theory.
    Frijters JE
    Percept Psychophys; 1980 Nov; 28(5):390-7. PubMed ID: 7208248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial four-alternative forced-choice method is the preferred psychophysical method for naïve observers.
    Jäkel F; Wichmann FA
    J Vis; 2006 Nov; 6(11):1307-22. PubMed ID: 17209737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of sniff bottle staircase and olfactometer-based threshold tests.
    Hayes JE; Jinks AL; Stevenson RJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Mar; 45(1):178-82. PubMed ID: 22836949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detecting gustatory-olfactory flavor mixtures: models of probability summation.
    Marks LE; Veldhuizen MG; Shepard TG; Shavit AY
    Chem Senses; 2012 Mar; 37(3):263-77. PubMed ID: 22075720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adaptive threshold estimation with unforced-choice tasks.
    Kaernbach C
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1377-88. PubMed ID: 11800463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of detection threshold values determined using glass sniff bottles and plastic squeeze bottles.
    Wudarski TJ; Doty RL
    Percept Mot Skills; 2004 Feb; 98(1):192-6. PubMed ID: 15058882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pregnancy does not affect human olfactory detection thresholds.
    Cameron EL
    Chem Senses; 2014 Feb; 39(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 24302690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Olfactory-evoked potentials: assessment of young and elderly, and comparison to psychophysical threshold.
    Murphy C; Nordin S; de Wijk RA; Cain WS; Polich J
    Chem Senses; 1994 Feb; 19(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 8055258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of smoking on olfactory thresholds of phenyl ethyl alcohol and n-butanol.
    Hayes JE; Jinks AL
    Physiol Behav; 2012 Sep; 107(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 22776624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maximum-likelihood psychometric procedures in two-alternative forced-choice: evaluation and recommendations.
    Madigan R; Williams D
    Percept Psychophys; 1987 Sep; 42(3):240-9. PubMed ID: 3671049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A psychophysical test of the vibration theory of olfaction.
    Keller A; Vosshall LB
    Nat Neurosci; 2004 Apr; 7(4):337-8. PubMed ID: 15034588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modern psychophysical tests to assess olfactory function.
    Eibenstein A; Fioretti AB; Lena C; Rosati N; Amabile G; Fusetti M
    Neurol Sci; 2005 Jul; 26(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 16086127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring smells.
    Haddad R; Lapid H; Harel D; Sobel N
    Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2008 Aug; 18(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 18824102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Subjective olfactory desensitization and recovery in humans.
    Stuck BA; Fadel V; Hummel T; Sommer JU
    Chem Senses; 2014 Feb; 39(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 24293565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of subjective perception with objective measurement of olfaction.
    Philpott CM; Wolstenholme CR; Goodenough PC; Clark A; Murty GE
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Mar; 134(3):488-90. PubMed ID: 16500450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of human olfactory biopsy on olfaction: a preliminary report.
    Lanza DC; Deems DA; Doty RL; Moran D; Crawford D; Rowley JC; Sajjadian A; Kennedy DW
    Laryngoscope; 1994 Jul; 104(7):837-40. PubMed ID: 8022246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Sense of smell in deaf and blind patients].
    Diekmann H; Walger M; von Wedel H
    HNO; 1994 May; 42(5):264-9. PubMed ID: 8050914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding smell--the olfactory stimulus problem.
    Auffarth B
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2013 Sep; 37(8):1667-79. PubMed ID: 23806440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unirhinal Olfactory Testing for the Diagnostic Workup of Mild Cognitive Impairment.
    Huart C; Rombaux P; Gérard T; Hanseeuw B; Lhommel R; Quenon L; Ivanoiu A; Mouraux A
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2015; 47(1):253-70. PubMed ID: 26402773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of strong fragrance on olfactory detection threshold.
    Fasunla AJ; Douglas DD; Adeosun AA; Steinbach S; Nwaorgu OG
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Sep; 151(3):438-42. PubMed ID: 24898071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.