These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7208274)

  • 1. The interfering effect of word perception on letter identification.
    Lawry JA
    Percept Psychophys; 1980 Dec; 28(6):577-88. PubMed ID: 7208274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Associative facilitation of word recognition as measured from a neutral prime.
    de Groot AM; Thomassen AJ; Hudson PT
    Mem Cognit; 1982 Jul; 10(4):358-70. PubMed ID: 7132713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Target letter inclusion in single and multiple word substrings and identification accuracy.
    Chastain G
    J Gen Psychol; 1988 Apr; 115(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 3385413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Not all visual features are created equal: early processing in letter and word recognition.
    Lanthier SN; Risko EF; Stolz JA; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 19145012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On priming by a sentence context.
    Stanovich KE; West RF
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1983 Mar; 112(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 6221061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Field dependence and short-term memory.
    Berger E; Goldberger L
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Aug; 49(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 503765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are letter codes always activated?
    Greenberg SN
    Percept Psychophys; 1988 Oct; 44(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 3226880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Episodic and lexical contributions to the repetition effect in word identification.
    Feustel TC; Shiffrin RM; Salasoo A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1983 Sep; 112(3):309-46. PubMed ID: 6225826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of letter orientation and sequential redundancy on the speed of letter search.
    Greenberg SN; Krueger LE
    Mem Cognit; 1983 Mar; 11(2):181-91. PubMed ID: 6865752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis.
    Janssen N; Schirm W; Mahon BZ; Caramazza A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):249-56. PubMed ID: 18194068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition.
    Simpson GB
    Psychol Bull; 1984 Sep; 96(2):316-40. PubMed ID: 6385046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interference in letter identification: a test of feature-specific inhibition.
    Santee JL; Egeth HE
    Percept Psychophys; 1980 Apr; 27(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 7383817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. More about the letter-frequency effect.
    Mason M
    Percept Psychophys; 1982 Jun; 31(6):589-90. PubMed ID: 7122197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of retroactive and proactive interference on learning and memory in old and young rats.
    Winocur G
    Dev Psychobiol; 1984 Sep; 17(5):537-45. PubMed ID: 6479455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: a comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies.
    Grainger J; Segui J
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Feb; 47(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 2304817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The perception of foreground and background as derived from structural information theory.
    Leeuwenberg E; Buffart H
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1984 May; 55(3):249-72. PubMed ID: 6464801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Input and distractor modality effects upon the release from proactive interference in children.
    Tyrrell DJ; Pressman M; Cunningham T; Steele GM; Thaller K
    J Genet Psychol; 1981 Dec; 139(2d Half):205-20. PubMed ID: 7320709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Buildup and release from proactive interference in a rhesus monkey.
    Jitsumori M; Wright AA; Shyan MR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1989 Oct; 15(4):329-37. PubMed ID: 2794869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of cognitive style and interstimulus interval on the hemispheric processing of tactile stimuli.
    Minagawa N; Kashu K
    Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Jun; 68(3 Pt 2):1031-9. PubMed ID: 2762069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of speed vs accuracy instructions and field dependence on college students' digit-symbol matching performance.
    Wong JL; Gilpin AR
    Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Aug; 73(1):314. PubMed ID: 1945711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.