These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. The reinforcing properties of amphetamine in overweight subjects and subjects with depression. de Wit H; Uhlenhuth EH; Johanson CE Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1987 Aug; 42(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 3608346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Emotional traits predict individual differences in amphetamine-induced positive mood in healthy volunteers. Kirkpatrick MG; Goldenson NI; Kapadia N; Kahler CW; de Wit H; Swift RM; McGeary JE; Sussman S; Leventhal AM Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2016 Jan; 233(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 26429791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contextual conditioning enhances the psychostimulant and incentive properties of d-amphetamine in humans. Childs E; de Wit H Addict Biol; 2013 Nov; 18(6):985-92. PubMed ID: 22129527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Drug preference in normal volunteers: effects of age and time of day. de Wit H; Uhlenhuth EH; Johanson CE Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1985; 87(2):186-93. PubMed ID: 3931144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Amphetamine-induced place preference in humans. Childs E; de Wit H Biol Psychiatry; 2009 May; 65(10):900-4. PubMed ID: 19111278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of small and moderate doses of d-amphetamine on hunger, mood, and arousal in man. Jain S; Kyriakides M; Silverstone T; Turner P Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1980; 70(1):109-11. PubMed ID: 6775327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subjective Effects of Alcohol Predict Alcohol Choice in Social Drinkers. Li J; Murray CH; Weafer J; de Wit H Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2020 Dec; 44(12):2579-2587. PubMed ID: 33201577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Individual differences in behavioral and subjective responses to alcohol. de Wit H; Uhlenhuth EH; Pierri J; Johanson CE Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 1987 Feb; 11(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 3551664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of d-amphetamine, secobarbital, and marijuana on choice behavior: social versus nonsocial options. Heishman SJ; Stitzer ML Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1989; 99(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 2508149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative effects of d-amphetamine, l-amphetamine, and methylphenidate on mood in man. Smith RC; Davis JM Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1977 Jun; 53(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 407607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of setting on the subjective and behavioral effects of d-amphetamine in humans. Zacny JP; Bodker BK; de Wit H Addict Behav; 1992; 17(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 1595423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of d-amphetamine on choice of social versus monetary reinforcement: a discrete-trial test. Higgins ST; Hughes JR; Bickel WK Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1989 Oct; 34(2):297-301. PubMed ID: 2622985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]