These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7209372)

  • 1. The effect of hearing protectors on the attention demand of warning sounds.
    Wilkins PA; Martin AM
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 7209372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of wearing hearing protectors on the audibility of railway warning signals - an experimental study.
    Arz JP; Gettliffe JP; Delattre P
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2018 Mar; 24(1):149-159. PubMed ID: 28869404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect on directional hearing in hunters using amplifying (level dependent) hearing protectors.
    Borg E; Bergkvist C; Bagger-Sjöbäck D
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):579-85. PubMed ID: 18520633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Augmented warning sound detection for hearing protectors.
    Bernstein ER; Brammer AJ; Yu G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):EL29-34. PubMed ID: 24437853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aspects on personal noise protection.
    Axelsson K; Axelsson A; Jonsson A
    Scand Audiol; 1978; 7(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 756091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Audibility of reverse alarms under hearing protectors for normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Robinson GS; Casali JG
    Ergonomics; 1995 Nov; 38(11):2281-99. PubMed ID: 7498188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of hearing protection on narrowband signal detection in industrial noise.
    Abel SM; Kunov H; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alberti PW
    J Otolaryngol; 1983 Apr; 12(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 6864854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effectiveness of hearing protective devices.
    Gosztonyi RE
    J Occup Med; 1975 Sep; 17(9):569-80. PubMed ID: 1165499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Directional localization in high ambient noise with and without the use of hearing protectors.
    Mershon DH; Lin LJ
    Ergonomics; 1987 Aug; 30(8):1161-73. PubMed ID: 3691470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Effectiveness of ear protective devices].
    Taniewski M; Zaborski L; Szczepański C; Nitka J
    Med Pr; 1978; 29(4):307-16. PubMed ID: 723611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Does the wearing of a hearing protective device influence the recognition of an acoustic signal].
    Lazarus H
    Zentralbl Arbeitsmed Arbeitsschutz Prophyl Ergonomie; 1980; 30(6):204-12. PubMed ID: 7467902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Working in noise with a hearing loss: perceptions from workers, supervisors, and hearing conservation program managers.
    Morata TC; Themann CL; Randolph RF; Verbsky BL; Byrne DC; Reeves ER
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):529-45. PubMed ID: 16377991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of an auditory situation awareness test battery for advanced hearing protectors and TCAPS: detection subtest of DRILCOM (detection-recognition/identification-localization-communication).
    Lee K; Casali JG
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup1):22-33. PubMed ID: 27905220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficiency of ear protectors in laboratory and real life tests.
    Pawlas K; Grzesik J
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 1990; 62(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 2379964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A study of the real-world noise attenuation of the current hearing protection devices in typical workplaces using Field Microphone in Real Ear method.
    Aliabadi M; Biabani A; Golmohammadi R; Farhadian M
    Work; 2018; 60(2):271-279. PubMed ID: 29865097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The process of encouraging wearing acoustic protectors in workers in a work place with deafening noise].
    Owada H
    Kango; 1985 Nov; 36(12):125-32. PubMed ID: 3850176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Group mean hearing threshold changes in a noise-exposed industrial population using personal hearing protectors.
    Savell JF; Toothman EH
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Jan; 48(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3565259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The performance of circumaural hearing protectors by dosimetry.
    Chung DY; Hardie R; Gannon RP
    J Occup Med; 1983 Sep; 25(9):679-82. PubMed ID: 6631567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of electronic ANR and conventional hearing protectors on vehicle backup alarm detection in noise.
    Casali JG; Robinson GS; Dabney EC; Gauger D
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 15151152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Signal detection in industrial noise: effects of noise exposure history, hearing loss, and the use of ear protection.
    Abel SM; Kunov H; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alberti PW
    Scand Audiol; 1985; 14(3):161-73. PubMed ID: 4059854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.