These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7209372)

  • 21. The effects of hearing protectors on auditory localization: evidence from audio-visual target acquisition.
    Bolia RS; McKinley RL
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2000; 6(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 11082547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Experimental assessment of the effect of wearing hearing protectors on the audibility of railway warning signals for normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Arz JP; Grimault N; El Sawaf O
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2022 Dec; 28(4):2385-2395. PubMed ID: 34633273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The noise exposed factory workers: the prevalence of sensori-neural hearing loss and their use of personal hearing protection devices.
    Maisarah SZ; Said H
    Med J Malaysia; 1993 Sep; 48(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 8183139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of ear protectors on word discrimination in subject with normal hearing and subjects with noise-induced hearing loss.
    Chung DY; Gannon RP
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 511652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Real-ear attenuation of earmuffs in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals.
    Suter AH; Lempert BL; Franks JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 May; 87(5):2114-7. PubMed ID: 2348018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Speech intelligibility and the use of hearing protectors.
    Lindeman HE
    Audiology; 1976; 15(4):348-56. PubMed ID: 1275819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Localization of Vehicle Back-Up Alarms by Users of Level-Dependent Hearing Protectors under Industrial Noise Conditions Generated at a Forge.
    Mlynski R; Kozlowski E
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jan; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 30704136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interventions to promote the wearing of hearing protection.
    El Dib RP; Verbeek J; Atallah AN; Andriolo RB; Soares BG
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2006 Apr; (2):CD005234. PubMed ID: 16625628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Comparison of knowledge and behavior toward hearing protection among workers in different workplaces and its influence factors].
    Yang M; Ou ZZ; Yang M; He P; He DK; Chen HQ; Liao XQ
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2018 Jun; 36(6):413-415. PubMed ID: 30248733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Signal recognition and hearing protectors with normal and impaired hearing.
    Lazarus H
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2005; 11(3):233-50. PubMed ID: 16219153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dependence of acoustic attenuation of hearing protectors on incident sound level.
    Martin AM
    Br J Ind Med; 1979 Feb; 36(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 444436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [DAMPENING PROPERTIES OF HEARING PROTECTIVE DEVICES WITH THE VIEW TO THE DEGREE OF INCONVENIENCE IN THEIR USE].
    STIKAR J; SULC J
    Cesk Hyg; 1965 Jun; 10():304-13. PubMed ID: 14333127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. German criteria for selection of hearing protectors in the interest of good signal audibility.
    Liedtke M
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2009; 15(2):163-74. PubMed ID: 19534849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Speech intelligibility in difficult signal/noise circumstances.
    Kiukaanniemi H; Sorri M
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1988; 30():215-8. PubMed ID: 3227274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A psychoacoustical model for specifying the level and spectrum of acoustic warning signals in the workplace.
    Zheng Y; Giguère C; Laroche C; Sabourin C; Gagné A; Elyea M
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Feb; 4(2):87-98. PubMed ID: 17249147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Gender differences in use of hearing protection devices among farm operators.
    McCullagh MC; Banerjee T; Yang JJ; Bernick J; Duffy S; Redman R
    Noise Health; 2016; 18(85):368-375. PubMed ID: 27991469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sound attenuation from earmuffs and earplugs in combination: maximum benefits vs. missed information.
    Abel SM; Odell P
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Sep; 77(9):899-904. PubMed ID: 16964737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Technology advancements in hearing protection circa 1995: active noise reduction, frequency/amplitude-sensitivity, and uniform attenuation.
    Casali JG; Berger EH
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1996 Feb; 57(2):175-85. PubMed ID: 8615326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Speech intelligibility in noise with ear protectors.
    Abel SM; Alberti PW; Riko K
    J Otolaryngol; 1980 Jun; 9(3):256-65. PubMed ID: 7001041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Objective determinations of individual sound protectors (author's transl)].
    Partsch CJ; Hülse M
    HNO; 1977 Nov; 25(11):386-8. PubMed ID: 924817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.