These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7211377)

  • 1. Blood pressure in Danish children and adolescents.
    Ibsen KK
    Acta Paediatr Scand; 1981 Jan; 70(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 7211377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Potential problems with the random-zero sphygmomanometer.
    Birkett NJ
    Hypertension; 1994 Feb; 23(2):254-7. PubMed ID: 8307636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Properties of the random zero sphygmomanometer.
    Kronmal RA; Rutan GH; Manolio TA; Borhani NO
    Hypertension; 1993 May; 21(5):632-7. PubMed ID: 8491498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The random-zero versus the standard mercury sphygmomanometer: a systematic blood pressure difference.
    de Gaudemaris R; Folsom AR; Prineas RJ; Luepker RV
    Am J Epidemiol; 1985 Feb; 121(2):282-90. PubMed ID: 4014120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproducibility and predictive values of routine blood pressure measurements in children. Comparison with adult values and implications for screening children for elevated blood pressure.
    Rosner B; Cook NR; Evans DA; Keough ME; Taylor JO; Polk BF; Hennekens CH
    Am J Epidemiol; 1987 Dec; 126(6):1115-25. PubMed ID: 3687921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Dinamap 1846SX automated blood pressure recorder: comparison with the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer under field conditions.
    Whincup PH; Bruce NG; Cook DG; Shaper AG
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1992 Apr; 46(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 1583434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison between brachial blood pressures obtained by aneroid sphygmomanometer and central aortic pressures: factors affecting the measurements].
    Kayrak M; Ulgen MS; Yazici M; Demir K; Doğan Y; Koç F; Zengin K; Ari H
    Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2008 Jun; 36(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 18765967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers.
    Parker D; Liu K; Dyer AR; Giumetti D; Liao YL; Stamler J
    Hypertension; 1988 Mar; 11(3):269-72. PubMed ID: 3280484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distribution of blood pressure in children and adolescents.
    Pistulková H; Widimský J; Geizerová H; Hejl Z; Rakická E
    Cor Vasa; 1982; 24(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 7067465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Consistency between the electronic and mercury sphygmomanometer in children and adolescents on blood pressure measuring].
    Cao Q; Li D; Yu W; Guo Q; Zhao L; Yu D; Wang Y
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2016 Sep; 45(5):758-765. PubMed ID: 29903127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Blood pressure in children and adolescents. Influence of methods of measurement -- Distribution of frequent values].
    André JL; Deschamps JP; Guéguen R; Jacques J
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1981 Jun; 74 Spec No():3-13. PubMed ID: 6794527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The Fuenlabrada study: arterial pressure in children and adolescents].
    Plaza I; Muñoz MT; Otero J; Madero R; Ros Jellici J; Ceñal MJ; López D; Baeza J; Parra MI; Puga M
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 1989 Nov; 42(9):570-80. PubMed ID: 2616841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Blood pressure: distribution in students of junior and senior high schools in Saint John, NB.
    Handa SP; Wolf HK
    Can Med Assoc J; 1985 Jan; 132(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 3965059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Blood pressure in a random sample of the New Zealand population.
    Nye ER; Paulin J; Russell DG
    N Z Med J; 1992 Jan; 105(926):1-3. PubMed ID: 1549265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Arterial stiffness as underlying mechanism of disagreement between an oscillometric blood pressure monitor and a sphygmomanometer.
    van Popele NM; Bos WJ; de Beer NA; van Der Kuip DA; Hofman A; Grobbee DE; Witteman JC
    Hypertension; 2000 Oct; 36(4):484-8. PubMed ID: 11040223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Mean blood pressure among the adults in China 2010-2012: based on the results of mercury sphygmomanometer and converted electronic sphygmomanometer].
    Yu DM; Fu P; Yu WT; Guo HJ; Yang XG; Zhao WH; Zhao LY
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 51(10):933-938. PubMed ID: 29036997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Blood pressure in Swedish school children.
    Wilton P
    Acta Paediatr Scand; 1983 Jul; 72(4):491-3. PubMed ID: 6624424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pulse sounds and measurement of diastolic blood pressure in children.
    Uhari M; Nuutinen M; Turtinen J; Pokka T
    Lancet; 1991 Jul; 338(8760):159-61. PubMed ID: 1677074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Field evaluation of the Copal UA-231 automatic sphygmomanometer.
    Rogers S; Smith GD; Doyle W
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1988 Dec; 42(4):321-4. PubMed ID: 3256572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
    Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.