These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7211963)

  • 1. The estimation of phenotype distributions from pedigree data.
    Winter RM
    Am J Med Genet; 1980; 7(4):537-42. PubMed ID: 7211963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A bivariate problem in human genetics: ascertainment of families through a correlated trait.
    Dawson DV; Elston RC
    Am J Med Genet; 1984 Jul; 18(3):435-48. PubMed ID: 6476005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ascertainment and goodness of fit of variance component models for pedigree data.
    Boehnke M; Lange K
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1984; 147():173-92. PubMed ID: 6547532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A nonparametric method for penetrance function estimation.
    Alarcon F; Bonaïti-Pellié C; Harari-Kermadec H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 33(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 18618769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ascertainment models incorporating effects of variable age of onset.
    Dawson DV
    Am J Med Genet; 1994 Dec; 53(4):340-7. PubMed ID: 7864043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Probability of gene identity by descent: computation and applications.
    Whittemore AS; Halpern J
    Biometrics; 1994 Mar; 50(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 8086594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monte Carlo estimation of mixed models for large complex pedigrees.
    Guo SW; Thompson EA
    Biometrics; 1994 Jun; 50(2):417-32. PubMed ID: 8068842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing marker-based estimates of heritability in the wild.
    Coltman DW
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jul; 14(8):2593-9. PubMed ID: 15969737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of genotype error rate using samples with pedigree information--an application on the GeneChip Mapping 10K array.
    Hao K; Li C; Rosenow C; Hung Wong W
    Genomics; 2004 Oct; 84(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 15475239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Missing phenotype data imputation in pedigree data analysis.
    Fridley BL; de Andrade M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 32(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 17685457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ascertainment correction for Markov chain Monte Carlo segregation and linkage analysis of a quantitative trait.
    Ma J; Amos CI; Warwick Daw E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 31(6):594-604. PubMed ID: 17487893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correcting for ascertainment bias of relative-risk estimates obtained using affected-sib-pair linkage data.
    Cordell HJ; Olson JM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):307-21. PubMed ID: 10797591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of conditioning on probands to correct for multiple ascertainment.
    Boehnke M; Greenberg DA
    Am J Hum Genet; 1984 Nov; 36(6):1298-308. PubMed ID: 6517053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Analysis of quantitative trait loci using hybrid pedigrees: quantitative traits of animals].
    Svishcheva GR
    Genetika; 2007 Feb; 43(2):265-75. PubMed ID: 17385327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The ENCU scoring system. A strategy for solving a class of single-locus genetic counseling problems.
    Chase GA; Murphy EA; Bolling DR
    Clin Genet; 1971; 2(3):141-8. PubMed ID: 5111757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic counseling for autosomal dominant disorders with incomplete penetrance.
    Aylsworth AS; Kirkman HN
    Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser; 1979; 15(5C):25-38. PubMed ID: 526607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating penetrance from family data using a retrospective likelihood when ascertainment depends on genotype and age of onset.
    Carayol J; Bonaïti-Pellié C
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 27(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 15305327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sample size required for predefined linkage decision quality.
    Ginsburg EK; Axenovich TI
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(5):479-91. PubMed ID: 9358266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A resolution of the ascertainment sampling problem: IV. Continuous phenotypes.
    Ewens WJ; Green RM
    Genet Epidemiol; 1988; 5(6):433-44. PubMed ID: 3061868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The differentiation of the nature of the segregation of inheritance in the analysis of complete genealogical data.
    Sirotkin VM; Pazoni I; Farzan RKh
    Sov Genet; 1973 Nov; 7(7):940-7. PubMed ID: 4777947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.