180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7213163)
1. A comparison of the Frisby, Random-Dot E, TNO, and Randot circles stereotests in screening and office use.
Simons K
Arch Ophthalmol; 1981 Mar; 99(3):446-52. PubMed ID: 7213163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Overestimation of stereo thresholds by the TNO stereotest is not due to global stereopsis.
Vancleef K; Read JCA; Herbert W; Goodship N; Woodhouse M; Serrano-Pedraza I
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):507-520. PubMed ID: 28337792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stereoacuity norms in young children.
Simons K
Arch Ophthalmol; 1981 Mar; 99(3):439-45. PubMed ID: 7213162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maximum angle of horizontal strabismus consistent with true stereopsis.
Leske DA; Holmes JM
J AAPOS; 2004 Feb; 8(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 14970796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stereoacuity norms for school-age children using the Frisby stereotest.
Anketell PM; Saunders KJ; Little JA
J AAPOS; 2013 Dec; 17(6):582-7. PubMed ID: 24321423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening merits of the Lang II, Frisby, Randot, Titmus, and TNO stereo tests.
Ohlsson J; Villarreal G; Abrahamsson M; Cavazos H; Sjöström A; Sjöstrand J
J AAPOS; 2001 Oct; 5(5):316-22. PubMed ID: 11641643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stereopsis in small-angle strabismus.
Rutstein RP; Eskridge JB
Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1984 Aug; 61(8):491-8. PubMed ID: 6496643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Normative Values for Near and Distance Clinical Tests of Stereoacuity.
Piano ME; Tidbury LP; O'Connor AR
Strabismus; 2016 Dec; 24(4):169-172. PubMed ID: 27929725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Testability of preschoolers on stereotests used to screen vision disorders.
Schmidt PP; Maguire MG; Moore B; Cyert L;
Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Nov; 80(11):753-7. PubMed ID: 14627942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effectiveness of the random dot E stereotest as a preschool vision screening instrument.
Rosner J
J Am Optom Assoc; 1978 Oct; 49(10):1121-4. PubMed ID: 730980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity of the Titmus and Randot circles tasks in children with known binocular vision disorders.
Fawcett SL; Birch EE
J AAPOS; 2003 Oct; 7(5):333-8. PubMed ID: 14566315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Random dot stereogram E in vision screening of children.
Hope C; Maslin K
Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1990 Aug; 18(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 2261180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of a modified (two-item) Frisby with the standard Frisby and Random-Dot E stereotests when used with preschool children.
Gruber J; Dickey P; Rosner J
Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1985 May; 62(5):349-51. PubMed ID: 4003526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation between depth perception by three-rods test and stereoacuity by distance Randot Stereotest.
Matsuo T; Negayama R; Sakata H; Hasebe K
Strabismus; 2014 Sep; 22(3):133-7. PubMed ID: 25058604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ASTEROID stereotest v1.0: lower stereo thresholds using smaller, denser and faster dots.
Read JCA; Wong ZY; Yek X; Wong YX; Bachtoula O; Llamas-Cornejo I; Serrano-Pedraza I
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2020 Nov; 40(6):815-827. PubMed ID: 32989799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Random-dot-stereogram performance by strabismic, amblyopic, and ocular-pathology patients in an operant-discrimination task.
Cooper J; Feldman J
Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1978 Sep; 55(9):599-609. PubMed ID: 742651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. BVAT distance vs. near stereopsis screening of strabismus, strabismic amblyopia and refractive amblyopia; a prospective study of 68 patients.
Rutstein RP; Corliss DA
Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2000; 15(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 10960226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of the stereovisual acuity, Randot stereotests, Frisby stereotest, Wirt test, TNO test of 442 normal children with stereovisual test chart].
Zhou YH; Yuan NF; Li J; Liu MX
Yan Ke Xue Bao; 1988 Mar; 4(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 3240805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. An evaluation of the agreement between contour-based circles and random dot-based near stereoacuity tests.
Fawcett SL
J AAPOS; 2005 Dec; 9(6):572-8. PubMed ID: 16414526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Testing stereopsis in the preschool child: is it clinically useful?
Manny RE; Martinez AT; Fern KD
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 1991; 28(4):223-31. PubMed ID: 1919971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
