BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7213163)

  • 21. Intraexaminer repeatability and agreement in stereoacuity measurements made in young adults.
    Antona B; Barrio A; Sanchez I; Gonzalez E; Gonzalez G
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2015; 8(2):374-81. PubMed ID: 25938059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Characterizing the Randot Preschool stereotest: Testability, norms, reliability, specificity and sensitivity in children aged 2-11 years.
    Read JCA; Rafiq S; Hugill J; Casanova T; Black C; O'Neill A; Puyat V; Haggerty H; Smart K; Powell C; Taylor K; Clarke MP; Vancleef K
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224402. PubMed ID: 31697704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Glasses-free randot stereotest.
    Kim J; Hong JY; Hong K; Yang HK; Han SB; Hwang JM; Lee B
    J Biomed Opt; 2015 Jun; 20(6):065004. PubMed ID: 26057031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of stereoacuity with a digital mobile application.
    Bonfanti S; Gargantini A; Esposito G; Facchin A; Maffioletti M; Maffioletti S
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 259(9):2843-2848. PubMed ID: 33907883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Validity of the Worth 4 Dot Test in Patients with Red-Green Color Vision Defect.
    Bak E; Yang HK; Hwang JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 May; 94(5):626-629. PubMed ID: 28234793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Differences in stereoacuity between crossed and uncrossed disparities reduce with practice.
    Clayton R; Siderov J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2022 Nov; 42(6):1353-1362. PubMed ID: 35997266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Artificial intelligence-based screening for amblyopia and its risk factors: comparison with four classic stereovision tests.
    Csizek Z; Mikó-Baráth E; Budai A; Frigyik AB; Pusztai Á; Nemes VA; Závori L; Fülöp D; Czigler A; Szabó-Guth K; Buzás P; Piñero DP; Jandó G
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2023; 10():1294559. PubMed ID: 38196833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Digital Alternative to the TNO Stereo Test to Qualify Military Aircrew.
    Posselt BN; Seemiller E; Winterbottom M; Baber C; Hadley S
    Aerosp Med Hum Perform; 2022 Dec; 93(12):846-854. PubMed ID: 36757245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A New Distance Stereotest by Autostereoscopic Display Using an Eye-Tracking Method.
    Cao LQ; Wang YQ; Gao Y; Zhou BY; Li XL; Shen KQ; Xu B; Li MG
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():799744. PubMed ID: 35795164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The eRDS v6 Stereotest and the Vivid Vision Stereo Test: Two New Tests of Stereoscopic Vision.
    Denkinger S; Antoniou MP; Tarello D; Levi DM; Backus BT; Bavelier D; Chopin A
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2023 Mar; 12(3):1. PubMed ID: 36857068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An Evaluation of the Agreement Between a Computerized Stereoscopic Game Test and the TNO Stereoacuity Test.
    Portela-Camino JA; Martín-González S; Ruiz-Alcocer J; Illarramendi-Mendicute I; Garrido-Mercado R
    Clin Optom (Auckl); 2021; 13():181-190. PubMed ID: 34267572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Binocular vision measurements with a new online digital platform: comparison with conventional clinical measures.
    Mena-Guevara KJ; de Fez D; Molina-Martín A; Piñero DP
    Clin Exp Optom; 2023 Nov; ():1-7. PubMed ID: 37944504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. ASTEROID: A New Clinical Stereotest on an Autostereo 3D Tablet.
    Vancleef K; Serrano-Pedraza I; Sharp C; Slack G; Black C; Casanova T; Hugill J; Rafiq S; Burridge J; Puyat V; Enongue JE; Gale H; Akotei H; Collier Z; Haggerty H; Smart K; Powell C; Taylor K; Clarke MP; Morgan G; Read JCA
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2019 Jan; 8(1):25. PubMed ID: 30834173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Effect of Clinical Visual Stress on Stereoacuity Measured with the TNO Test.
    Abd Manan F; Jenkins TC; Collinge AJ
    Malays J Med Sci; 2001 Jul; 8(2):25-31. PubMed ID: 22893757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Screening for Stereopsis of Children Using an Autostereoscopic Smartphone.
    Yang Y; Wu H
    J Ophthalmol; 2019; 2019():1570309. PubMed ID: 31781370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluating distance stereoacuity in children 4-17 years of age with a novel digital application.
    Barnett-Itzhaki G; Barnett-Itzhaki Z; Ela-Dalman N; Mezad-Koursh D
    J AAPOS; 2024 Jun; 28(3):103904. PubMed ID: 38552945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluating the Mechanism by Which the TNO Stereo Test Overestimates Stereo Thresholds.
    Zhang Y; Meng B; Wu H
    J Ophthalmol; 2021; 2021():6665638. PubMed ID: 33532093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Screening for Stereopsis Using an Eye-Tracking Glasses-Free Display in Adults: A Pilot Study.
    Liu F; Zhao J; Han T; Shen Y; Li M; Liu J; Yang D; Fang Y; Yan L; Zhou X
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2021; 8():814908. PubMed ID: 35118100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Measuring visual acuity in infants.
    Fulton AB; Hansen RM; Manning KA
    Surv Ophthalmol; 1981; 25(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 7221878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Distinct rich and diverse clubs regulate coarse and fine binocular disparity processing: Evidence from stereoscopic task-based fMRI.
    Lohia K; Soans RS; Saxena R; Mahajan K; Gandhi TK
    iScience; 2024 Jun; 27(6):109831. PubMed ID: 38784010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.