These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7213163)

  • 41. Defining real change in measures of stereoacuity.
    Adams WE; Leske DA; Hatt SR; Holmes JM
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Feb; 116(2):281-5. PubMed ID: 19091410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A Random Dot Computer Video Game Improves Stereopsis.
    Portela-Camino JA; Martín-González S; Ruiz-Alcocer J; Illarramendi-Mendicute I; Garrido-Mercado R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Jun; 95(6):523-535. PubMed ID: 29787486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Quantification of Stereopsis in Patients with Impaired Binocularity.
    Han SB; Yang HK; Kim J; Hong K; Lee B; Hwang JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Jun; 93(6):588-93. PubMed ID: 26927523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Classification and misclassification of sensory monofixation in intermittent exotropia.
    Hatt SR; Leske DA; Mohney BG; Brodsky MC; Holmes JM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jul; 150(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 20381008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. New stereoacuity test using a 3-dimensional display system in children.
    Han SB; Yang HK; Kim J; Hong K; Lee B; Hwang JM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0116626. PubMed ID: 25693034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The Effects of Anisometropic Amblyopia on the FNS and TNO Stereotest Thresholds in Four- to Eight-Year-Olds.
    Ateiza A; Davis H
    Br Ir Orthopt J; 2019 Apr; 15(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 32999977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Random dot stereoacuity of preschool children. ALSPAC "Children in Focus" Study Team.
    Birch E; Williams C; Hunter J; Lapa MC
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 1997; 34(4):217-22; quiz 247-8. PubMed ID: 9253735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. An investigation of the difference in stereoacuity between crossed and uncrossed disparities using Frisby and TNO tests.
    Larson WL
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Mar; 67(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 2320359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparative analysis of the Lang Stereopad in a non-clinic population.
    Rowe FJ; Hepworth LR; Howard C; Chean CS; Mistry M
    Strabismus; 2019 Sep; 27(3):182-190. PubMed ID: 31329020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Randot stereoacuity testing in young children.
    Kulp MT; Mitchell GL
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2005; 42(6):360-4. PubMed ID: 16382561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of the Effect of Different Types of Experimental Anisometropia on Stereopsis Measured with Titmus, Randot and TNO Stereotests.
    Nabie R; Andalib D; Khojasteh H; Aslanzadeh SA
    J Ophthalmic Vis Res; 2019; 14(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 30820287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Validation of dynamic random dot stereotests in pediatric vision screening.
    Budai A; Czigler A; Mikó-Baráth E; Nemes VA; Horváth G; Pusztai Á; Piñero DP; Jandó G
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Feb; 257(2):413-423. PubMed ID: 30284041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Interobserver test-retest reliability of the Randot preschool stereoacuity test.
    Fawcett SL; Birch EE
    J AAPOS; 2000 Dec; 4(6):354-8. PubMed ID: 11124670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The Effect of Refractive Amblyopia on the Frisby Stereotest.
    Nanda KD; Nischal KK
    J Binocul Vis Ocul Motil; 2023; 73(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 35984966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Assessment of stereovision with digital testing in adults and children with normal and impaired binocularity.
    Tittes J; Baldwin AS; Hess RF; Cirina L; Wenner Y; Kuhli-Hattenbach C; Ackermann H; Kohnen T; Fronius M
    Vision Res; 2019 Nov; 164():69-82. PubMed ID: 31377344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Final version of the Distance Randot Stereotest: normative data, reliability, and validity.
    Wang J; Hatt SR; O'Connor AR; Drover JR; Adams R; Birch EE; Holmes JM
    J AAPOS; 2010 Apr; 14(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 20199880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison of the INNOVA Visual Acuity System Stereotest with the Frisby-Davis 2 Stereotest for the Evaluation of Distance Stereoacuity.
    Singman EL; Matta NS; Silbert DI; Tian J
    Binocul Vis Strabolog Q Simms Romano; 2013; 28(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 23822912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. An evaluation of techniques for measuring stereopsis in infants and young children.
    Broadbent H; Westall C
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1990 Jan; 10(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 2184389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Accuracy of the Lang II stereotest in screening for binocular disorders in 6-year-old children.
    Huynh SC; Ojaimi E; Robaei D; Rose K; Mitchell P
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Dec; 140(6):1130-2. PubMed ID: 16376664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The effect of induced monocular blur on measures of stereoacuity.
    Odell NV; Hatt SR; Leske DA; Adams WE; Holmes JM
    J AAPOS; 2009 Apr; 13(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 19071047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.