These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7213207)
1. Some systematic observations on monaural diplacusis. Formby C; Gjerdingen DB Audiology; 1981; 20(3):219-33. PubMed ID: 7213207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A case study of monaural diplacusis. Bacon SP; Viemeister NF Hear Res; 1985; 19(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 4066513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceptual consequences of the interactions between spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and external tones. I. Monaural diplacusis and aftertones. Long G Hear Res; 1998 May; 119(1-2):49-60. PubMed ID: 9641318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Complex tone stimulation may induce binaural diplacusis with low-tone hearing loss. Ichimiya I; Ichimiya H PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210939. PubMed ID: 30682080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. II. Pitch shift, pitch ambiguity, phase invariance, pitch circularity, rate pitch, and the dominance region for pitch. Cariani PA; Delgutte B J Neurophysiol; 1996 Sep; 76(3):1717-34. PubMed ID: 8890287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pure-tone pitch anomalies. II. Pitch-intensity effects and diplacusis in impaired ears. Burns EM; Turner C J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 May; 79(5):1530-40. PubMed ID: 3711452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neural sensitivity to periodicity in the inferior colliculus: evidence for the role of cochlear distortions. McAlpine D J Neurophysiol; 2004 Sep; 92(3):1295-311. PubMed ID: 15128750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training. Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch. Schatzer R; Vermeire K; Visser D; Krenmayr A; Kals M; Voormolen M; Van de Heyning P; Zierhofer C Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():26-35. PubMed ID: 24252455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The auditory evoked magnetic fields to very high frequency tones. Fujioka T; Kakigi R; Gunji A; Takeshima Y Neuroscience; 2002; 112(2):367-81. PubMed ID: 12044454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dead regions and pitch perception. Huss M; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Jun; 117(6):3841-52. PubMed ID: 16018486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The threshold for binaural interaction. Hafter ER; Kimball P J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 May; 67(5):1823-5. PubMed ID: 7372938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The interdependence of pitch and temporal judgments by absolute pitch possessors. Shigeno S Percept Psychophys; 1993 Nov; 54(5):682-92. PubMed ID: 8290337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pure-tone anomalies. I. Pitch-intensity effects and diplacusis in normal ears. Burns EM J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Nov; 72(5):1394-402. PubMed ID: 7175025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dominance region for pitch: effects of duration and dichotic presentation. Gockel H; Carlyon RP; Plack CJ J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1326-36. PubMed ID: 15807021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relative role of beats and combination tones in determining the shapes of masking patterns: II. Hearing-impaired listeners. Alcántara JI; Moore BC Hear Res; 2002 Mar; 165(1-2):103-16. PubMed ID: 12031520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Human cortical responses to slow and fast binaural beats reveal multiple mechanisms of binaural hearing. Ross B; Miyazaki T; Thompson J; Jamali S; Fujioka T J Neurophysiol; 2014 Oct; 112(8):1871-84. PubMed ID: 25008412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On the existence in human auditory pathways of channels selectively tuned to the modulation present in frequency-modulated tones. Kay RH; Matthews DR J Physiol; 1972 Sep; 225(3):657-77. PubMed ID: 5076392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Age-related difference in melodic pitch perception is probably mediated by temporal processing: empirical and computational evidence. Russo FA; Ives DT; Goy H; Pichora-Fuller MK; Patterson RD Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 22367092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]