These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7214807)
1. Fractionated dose cholecystography: a comparison between iopanoic acid and sodium ipodate. Reiner RG; Lawson MJ; Davies GT; Tucker WG; Mileski O; Read TR; Grant AK Clin Radiol; 1980 Nov; 31(6):667-9. PubMed ID: 7214807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of diet and fasting on gallbladder opacification during oral cholecystography in dogs as measured by computed tomography. Fon GT; Hunter TB; Berk RN; Capp MP Radiology; 1980 Sep; 136(3):585-92. PubMed ID: 7403534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The effect of diarrhea on gallbladder opacification during oral cholecystography: comparison of two cholecystographic agents (author's transl)]. Fukuda K; Nanjo M; Harada J; Sekiya T; Kanehira Y; Anno I; Takayama M; Watanabe H; Yamada T; Yamaguchi M; Tada S Rinsho Hoshasen; 1979 Mar; 24(3):379-84. PubMed ID: 547079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative trial of three oral cholecystographic contrast media--iocetamic acid, iopanoic acid and sodium ipodate. Cargill A; Hately W Br J Radiol; 1981 Jan; 54(637):79-80. PubMed ID: 6449974 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical comparison of tyropanoate sodium, ipodate sodium, and iopanoic acid. Russell JG; Frederick PR Radiology; 1974 Sep; 112(3):519-23. PubMed ID: 4843279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The biliary and urinary excretion of sodium tyropanoate and sodium ipodate in dogs: pharmacokinetics, influence of bile salts and choleretic effects with comparison to iopanoic acid. Berk RN; Loeb PM; Cobo-Frenkel A; Barnhart JL Invest Radiol; 1977; 12(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 838560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combined use of ipodate and iopanoic acid for routine oral cholecystocholangiography. Levine MH; Geiger F Radiology; 1968 Aug; 91(2):383-5. PubMed ID: 5661277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative trial of telepaque and biloptin. MANTON DJ Br J Radiol; 1961 May; 34():298-301. PubMed ID: 13766333 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A double-blind study of ipodate and the non-diagnostic cholecystogram. Newman DE; Fellows KE J Can Assoc Radiol; 1970 Sep; 21(3):149-52. PubMed ID: 4920246 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical comparison of two contrast agents for oral cholecystography: radiologic efficacy and drug safety of iopanoic acid and iopronic acid. Hedlund L; Putman CE; Burrell M Yale J Biol Med; 1979; 52(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 380184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The reliability of cholecystography with calcium ipodate augmentation. Seymour EQ Am Surg; 1980 Jun; 46(6):352-4. PubMed ID: 6772057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of three-day oral cholecystography on serum iodothyronines and TSH concentrations: comparison of the effects among some cholecystographic agents and the effects of iopanoic acid on the pituitary-thyroid axis. Suzuki H; Kadena N; Takeuchi K; Nakagawa S Acta Endocrinol (Copenh); 1979 Nov; 92(3):477-88. PubMed ID: 517049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Residual contrast medium in the intestines and side effects during cholecystography. A comparison between some contrast media in current use and a new medium. Eriksson S; Saltzman GF Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1970 Jan; 10(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 5447107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Oragrafin, a new cholecystographic medium: a double-blind comparison with Telepaque. JUHL JH; COOPERMAN LR; CRUMMY AB Radiology; 1963 Jan; 80():87-91. PubMed ID: 13957983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of fasting on gallbladder opacification during oral cholecystography: a controlled study in normal volunteers. Loeb PM; Berk RN; Janes JO; Perkin L; Moore J Radiology; 1978 Feb; 126(2):395-401. PubMed ID: 341220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gallbladder density and iodine concentration in humans during oral cholecystography. A comparison of iopanoic acid and iopronic acid. Thompson WM; Meyers WC; Shaw M; Bates M; Johnson GA; Hedlund LW Invest Radiol; 1982; 17(6):621-8. PubMed ID: 6759456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gall-bladder contraction and bile duct opacification in oral cholecystography--a comparison of different methods. McConnell CA; Whitehouse GH; Evans AF Br J Radiol; 1983 Jun; 56(666):371-6. PubMed ID: 6342701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical comparison of locetamic acid (cholebrine) and ipodate sodium (Orgrafin). Neal RR; Harvey KG; Cantwell KG; Press HC AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1979 May; 132(5):735-6. PubMed ID: 155391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Concentration and excretion of contrast agents during oral cholecystography as measured by computed tomography in dogs. Hunter TB; Fon GT; Berk RN; Capp MP Gastrointest Radiol; 1981; 6(4):349-52. PubMed ID: 7308718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]