These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Articulatory dimensions of hearing-impaired speakers' intelligibility: evidence from a time-related aerodynamic, acoustic, and electroglottographic study. Samar VJ; Metz DE; Schiavetti N; Sitler RW; Whitehead RL J Commun Disord; 1989 Aug; 22(4):243-64. PubMed ID: 2794107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The role of phase-locking to the temporal envelope of speech in auditory perception and speech intelligibility. Millman RE; Johnson SR; Prendergast G J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Mar; 27(3):533-45. PubMed ID: 25244119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Hearing-impaired children's rhythm perception and speech. Arnold P; Willis K Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Feb; 72(1):88-90. PubMed ID: 2038540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Airflow characteristics of fricative consonants produced by normally hearing and hearing-impaired speakers. Whitehead RL; Barefoot SM J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Jun; 26(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 6887804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Superior ultra-audiometric hearing: a new type of hearing loss which correlates highly with unusually good speech in the "profoundly deaf". Berlin CI; Wexler KF; Jerger JF; Halperin HR; Smith S Otolaryngology; 1978; 86(1):ORL-111-6. PubMed ID: 114908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Scaling and transcription measures of intelligibility for populations with disordered speech. Tye-Murray N; Barkmeier J; Folkins JW J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Jun; 34(3):697-702. PubMed ID: 2072696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Auditory detection of spondaic words in wide-band noise by adults with normal hearing and by children with profound hearing losses. Erber NP J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Jun; 14(2):372-81. PubMed ID: 5558093 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The use of artificial neural networks to estimate speech intelligibility from acoustic variables: a preliminary analysis. Metz DE; Schiavetti N; Knight SD J Commun Disord; 1992 Mar; 25(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 1401230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Audiometric analysis as a predictor of speech intelligibility. Kyle JG Br J Audiol; 1977 May; 11(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 922225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Discrimination of filtered-clipped speech by hearing-impaired subjects. Thomas IB; Sparks DW J Acoust Soc Am; 1971 Jun; 49(6):1881-7. PubMed ID: 5125737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The relation between auditory discrimination and phonological disorder. Brancalioni AR; Bertagnolli AP; Bonini JB; Gubiani MB; Keske-Soares M J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol; 2012; 24(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 22832684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Auditory training and cognitive functioning in adult with traumatic brain injury. Murphy CF; Fillippini R; Palma D; Zalcman TE; Lima JP; Schochat E Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2011; 66(4):713-5. PubMed ID: 21655770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Quantitative studies on the auditory threshold, adaptation and sound perception in healthy subjects and in hearing disorders by means of "objective audiometry"]. Stange G; Soda T Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1968; 190(2):210-28. PubMed ID: 5758293 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]