These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
83. A comparison of oto-acoustic emissions and brain stem electric response audiometry in the normal newborn and babies admitted to a special care baby unit. Stevens JC; Webb HD; Smith MF; Buffin JT; Ruddy H Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1987 May; 8(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 3595084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
84. The frequency of auditory neuropathy detected by universal newborn hearing screening program. Kirkim G; Serbetcioglu B; Erdag TK; Ceryan K Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Oct; 72(10):1461-9. PubMed ID: 18674822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. [Age-related characteristics of dynamic indicators of acoustic impedance of the middle ear in children]. Sagalovich BM; Shimanskaia EI Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1992; (3):9-13. PubMed ID: 1523778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. Reply to: "M. Delaroche, R. Thiebaut, R. Dauman, Behavioural audiometry: protocols for measuring hearing thresholds in babies aged 4-18 months" [Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 68 (2004) 1233-1243]. Killan EC; Totten CL Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Sep; 69(9):1291-3; author reply 1295-7. PubMed ID: 16046002 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
87. [Diagnosis of hearing disorders in children with early evoked auditory brainstem potentials]. Savić L; Milosević D; Komazec Z Med Pregl; 1999; 52(3-5):146-50. PubMed ID: 10518400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. [Detection of deafness in children and therapeutic measures. Balance of 10 years of practice]. Roulleau P; Chaperon C Ann Pediatr (Paris); 1984 Dec; 31(11):887-91. PubMed ID: 6524829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
90. Evaluation of the auditory system: an update. Brackmann DE; Forquer BD Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1983; 92(6 Pt 1):651-6. PubMed ID: 6660758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. Diagnosis of hearing loss in infants using auditory evoked responses. Rapin I; Ruben RJ; Lyttle M Laryngoscope; 1970 May; 80(5):712-22. PubMed ID: 5452510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
92. The choice of stimulus in the auditory brainstem response test for neurological and audiological examinations. Suzuki J; Yamane H Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1982; 388():731-6. PubMed ID: 6953910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
94. [Contribution of evoked potentials of the brain stem to the topographic diagnosis of deafness in children]. Charachon R; Dumas G; Pellat J; Bertholet M; Richard J J Fr Otorhinolaryngol Audiophonol Chir Maxillofac; 1980 Mar; 29(3):187-90, 192-3. PubMed ID: 6449552 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
95. [Can impaired hearing be demonstrated objectively?]. Schorn K MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1982 Nov; 124(45):989-91. PubMed ID: 6817102 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
96. Brainstem-evoked response audiometry: normative data from the preterm infant. Cox C; Hack M; Metz D Audiology; 1981; 20(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 7213201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. [Hearing disorders screening in neonates at risk]. Morlet T; Moulin A; Putet G; Sevin F; Dubreuil C; Duclaux R; Ferber-Viart C Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 2001 Feb; 118(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 11240432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]