These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7217519)

  • 1. Measurement of the 2f1-f2 cubic difference tone with the binaural masking-level difference.
    Lutfi FA; Yost WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Jan; 69(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 7217519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus to binaural masking level difference stimuli measured by rate-versus-level functions.
    Jiang D; McAlpine D; Palmer AR
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jun; 77(6):3085-106. PubMed ID: 9212259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Brain stem and cortical mechanisms underlying the binaural masking level difference in humans: an auditory steady-state response study.
    Wong WY; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 14770018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Binaural masking level differences in the inferior colliculus of the guinea pig.
    McAlpine D; Jiang D; Palmer AR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jul; 100(1):490-503. PubMed ID: 8675842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural responses in the inferior colliculus to binaural masking level differences created by inverting the noise in one ear.
    Palmer AR; Jiang D; McAlpine D
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Aug; 84(2):844-52. PubMed ID: 10938311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Off-frequency BMLD: the role of monaural processing.
    van de Par S; Luebken B; Verhey JL; Kohlrausch A
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():293-301. PubMed ID: 23716235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in White Leghorn chickens (Gallus domesticus): effects of frequency ratio and relative level.
    Burkard R; Salvi R; Chen L
    Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(4):197-213. PubMed ID: 9390802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Binaural modulation masking.
    Grantham DW; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1340-9. PubMed ID: 2030221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychophysical tuning curves for combination tones 2f1-f2 and f2-f1.
    Formby C; Sachs RM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 May; 67(5):1754-8. PubMed ID: 7372931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Growth of L(f2--f1) and L(2f1--f2) with input level: influence of f2/f1.
    Humes LE
    Hear Res; 1980 Mar; 2(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 7364667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychoacoustical and ear canal cancellation of (2f1-f2)-distortion products.
    Zwicker E; Harris FP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jun; 87(6):2583-91. PubMed ID: 2373793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanical responses to two-tone distortion products in the apical and basal turns of the mammalian cochlea.
    Cooper NP; Rhode WS
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jul; 78(1):261-70. PubMed ID: 9242278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural Correlates of the Binaural Masking Level Difference in Human Frequency-Following Responses.
    Clinard CG; Hodgson SL; Scherer ME
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Apr; 18(2):355-369. PubMed ID: 27896486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Binaural masking-level difference as a function of masker and test-signal duration.
    Zwicker UT; Zwicker E
    Hear Res; 1984 Mar; 13(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 6735929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The binaural masking-level difference of mandarin tone detection and the binaural intelligibility-level difference of mandarin tone recognition in the presence of speech-spectrum noise.
    Ho CY; Li PC; Chiang YC; Young ST; Chu WC
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0120977. PubMed ID: 25835987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Binaural masking-level differences with tones masked by noises of various bandwidths and levels.
    Zwicker E; Henning GB
    Hear Res; 1984 May; 14(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 6746431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of furosemide on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and on neuronal responses in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus.
    Rübsamen R; Mills DM; Rubel EW
    J Neurophysiol; 1995 Oct; 74(4):1628-38. PubMed ID: 8989399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of diotic and dichotic level-randomization on the binaural masking-level difference.
    Henning GB; Richards VM; Lentz JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Nov; 118(5):3229-40. PubMed ID: 16334902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Binaural masking level difference in skilled reading children and children with dyslexia.
    Putter-Katz H; Feldman I; Hildesheimer M
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2011 Sep; 22(3):59-63. PubMed ID: 22865426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cortical representation of the combination of monaural and binaural unmasking.
    Uppenkamp S; Uhlig CH; Verhey JL
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():435-42. PubMed ID: 23716250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.