These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Recognition of natural and time/intensity altered CVs by young and elderly subjects with normal hearing. Gordon-Salant S J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Dec; 80(6):1599-607. PubMed ID: 3794065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Consonant confusions in white noise. Phatak SA; Lovitt A; Allen JB J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1220-33. PubMed ID: 18681609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables. Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Recognition of digitized CV syllables in multitalker babble. Gordon-Salant S Audiology; 1985; 24(4):241-53. PubMed ID: 4051874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of Simulated Hearing Loss on Bilingual Children's Consonant Recognition in Noise. Nishi K; Trevino AC; Rosado Rogers L; GarcĂa P; Neely ST Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e292-e304. PubMed ID: 28353522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Consonant identification in consonant-vowel-consonant syllables in speech-spectrum noise. Woods DL; Yund EW; Herron TJ; Ua Cruadhlaoich MA J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1609-23. PubMed ID: 20329860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users. Donaldson GS; Kreft HA Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Baskent D; Wang X J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of consonant-vowel ratio modification on amplitude envelope cues for consonant recognition. Freyman RL; Nerbonne GP; Cote HA J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 2046366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measuring consonant identification in nonsense syllables, words, and sentences. Woods DL; Yund EW; Herron TJ J Rehabil Res Dev; 2010; 47(3):243-60. PubMed ID: 20665350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Consonant and vowel confusions in speech-weighted noise. Phatak SA; Allen JB J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Apr; 121(4):2312-26. PubMed ID: 17471744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neural indices of phonemic discrimination and sentence-level speech intelligibility in quiet and noise: A P3 study. Koerner TK; Zhang Y; Nelson PB; Wang B; Zou H Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():58-67. PubMed ID: 28441570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of acoustic modification on consonant recognition by elderly hearing-impaired subjects. Gordon-Salant S J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Apr; 81(4):1199-202. PubMed ID: 3571732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phoneme feature perception in noise by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Gordon-Salant S J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Mar; 28(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 3982002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The importance of consonant-vowel intensity ratio in the intelligibility of voiceless consonants. Freyman RL; Nerbonne GP J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Sep; 32(3):524-35. PubMed ID: 2779197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Children's phoneme identification in reverberation and noise. Johnson CE J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Feb; 43(1):144-57. PubMed ID: 10668658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]