These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7219181)

  • 1. Response selection in choice reaction time: test of a buffer model.
    Mewaldt SP; Connelly CL; Simon R
    Mem Cognit; 1980 Nov; 8(6):606-11. PubMed ID: 7219181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response selection in spatial choice reaction: further evidence against associative models.
    Duncan J
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1978 Aug; 30(3):429-40. PubMed ID: 693788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The changing pattern of perceptual analytic strategies and response selection with practice in a two-choice reaction time task.
    Fletcher B; Rabbitt PM
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1978 Aug; 30(3):417-27. PubMed ID: 693787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of alcohol and practice on choice reaction time.
    Maylor EA; Rabbitt PM
    Percept Psychophys; 1987 Nov; 42(5):465-75. PubMed ID: 3696941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Choice reaction time with a random foreperiod.
    Green DM; Smith AF; von Gierke SM
    Percept Psychophys; 1983 Sep; 34(3):195-208. PubMed ID: 6646960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The simplest complete model of choice response time: linear ballistic accumulation.
    Brown SD; Heathcote A
    Cogn Psychol; 2008 Nov; 57(3):153-78. PubMed ID: 18243170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling behavioral measures of error detection in choice tasks: response monitoring versus conflict monitoring.
    Steinhauser M; Maier M; Hübner R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Feb; 34(1):158-76. PubMed ID: 18248146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comments on the classic Henry And Rogers (1960) paper on its 50th anniversary: resolving the issue of simple versus choice reaction time.
    Klapp ST
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2010 Mar; 81(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 20387405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Expectancy and frequency effects on perceptual and motor systems in choice reaction time.
    Miller J; Anbar R
    Mem Cognit; 1981 Nov; 9(6):631-41. PubMed ID: 7329244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A ballistic model of choice response time.
    Brown S; Heathcote A
    Psychol Rev; 2005 Jan; 112(1):117-28. PubMed ID: 15631590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Theoretical interpretations of the speed and accuracy of positive and negative responses.
    Ratcliff R
    Psychol Rev; 1985 Apr; 92(2):212-25. PubMed ID: 3991839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Motor processes in simple, go/no-go, and choice reaction time tasks: a psychophysiological analysis.
    Miller JO; Low K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Apr; 27(2):266-89. PubMed ID: 11318047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multi-attribute, multi-alternative models of choice: Choice, reaction time, and process tracing.
    Cohen AL; Kang N; Leise TL
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 Nov; 98():45-72. PubMed ID: 28843070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Information processing abilities and performance on two perceptual-motor tasks.
    Siegel D
    Percept Mot Skills; 1985 Apr; 60(2):459-66. PubMed ID: 4000862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Choice in multi-alternative environments: a trial-by-trial implementation of the sequential choice model.
    Vasconcelos M; Monteiro T; Aw J; Kacelnik A
    Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):435-9. PubMed ID: 19948210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time course of free-choice priming effects explained by a simple accumulator model.
    Mattler U; Palmer S
    Cognition; 2012 Jun; 123(3):347-60. PubMed ID: 22475294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The roles of stimulus and response uncertainty in forced-choice performance: an amendment to Hick/Hyman Law.
    Wifall T; Hazeltine E; Toby Mordkoff J
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jul; 80(4):555-65. PubMed ID: 26059726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Categorization time as independent of the number of condition-action rules.
    Liu IM
    Percept Psychophys; 1985 Jan; 37(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 3991322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decision-tree models of categorization response times, choice proportions, and typicality judgments.
    Lafond D; Lacouture Y; Cohen AL
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Oct; 116(4):833-55. PubMed ID: 19839685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of average uncertainty and trial-type frequency on choice response time: A hierarchical extension of Hick/Hyman Law.
    Mordkoff JT
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):2012-2020. PubMed ID: 28283943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.