These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court. Brown HO Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions. Haas-Wilson D J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Criminal liability of physicians: an encroachment on the abortion right? Barber RA Am Crim Law Rev; 1981; 18(4):591-615. PubMed ID: 11655468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A technical knockout for parental notification. Fam Plann Perspect; 1987; 19(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 3556537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Abortion in the United States. Decisions of the Supreme Court]. Veylon R Nouv Presse Med; 1973 Jul; 2(29):1952-4. PubMed ID: 4724400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Potential constitutional issues raised by the proposed amendments to the Georgia abortion statute. Berg RN J Med Assoc Ga; 1982 Feb; 71(2):128-31. PubMed ID: 7077199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Teenage abortion in Germany: with reference to the legal system in the United States. Belling DW; Eberl C J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 12(2):475-502. PubMed ID: 8666732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Right to abortion: the courts versus the legislatures. Bernstein AH Hospitals; 1980 Jan; 54(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 6985600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Legal abortion: the impending obsolescence of the trimester framework. Mangel CP Am J Law Med; 1988; 14(1):69-108. PubMed ID: 3068986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law. Denniston L Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion 1982: the Supreme Court once again. Healey JM Conn Med; 1982 Nov; 46(11):681. PubMed ID: 7172671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice. Sayeed SA Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethical issues in U.S. family planning policy. Benshoof J Draper Fund Rep; 1983 Aug; (12):11-2. PubMed ID: 12338973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The abortion czar. Healey JM Conn Med; 1990 Sep; 54(9):533. PubMed ID: 2225825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The minor's right of privacy: limitations on state action after Danforth and Carey. Siliciano JA Columbia Law Rev; 1977 Dec; 77(8):1216-46. PubMed ID: 10273154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States. Weitz TA; Yanow S Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Court affirms physician's choice of abortion procedure. Stiller JA Hosp Med Staff; 1979 Oct; 8(10):10-2. PubMed ID: 10244309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]