These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7220407)

  • 1. The patient's subjective attitude towards screening for breast cancer. Should screening be extended to other forms of cancer?
    Taylor TV; Rimmer S; Forrest AP
    Postgrad Med J; 1980 Oct; 56(660):715-7. PubMed ID: 7220407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attendance at a breast screening clinic: a problem of administration or attitudes.
    French K; Porter AM; Robinson SE; McCallum FM; Howie JG; Roberts MM
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1982 Aug 28-Sep 4; 285(6342):617-20. PubMed ID: 6819038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Women's opinions about attending for breast cancer screening: stability of cognitive determinants during three rounds of screening.
    Drossaert CH; Boer H; Seydel ER
    Br J Health Psychol; 2005 Feb; 10(Pt 1):133-49. PubMed ID: 15826339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [1st results of a systematic survey of cancer in different Belgian populations].
    Maisin H; Van De Merckt J; Pham-Maldague HQ; Mazy G; Col-Debeys C; Salamon E
    Arch Belg Med Soc; 1967 Oct; 25(8):529-46. PubMed ID: 5596980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening for breast cancer. Report from Edinburgh Breast Screening Clinic.
    Br Med J; 1978 Jul; 2(6131):175-8. PubMed ID: 678836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychiatric morbidity after screening for breast cancer.
    Dean C; Roberts MM; French K; Robinson S
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1986 Mar; 40(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 3711771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increasing incidence of breast cancer: distinguishing between the effects of birth cohort and a national breast screening programme.
    Brown SB; Morrison DS; Cooke TG
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Aug; 116(3):603-7. PubMed ID: 18855136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk perception and psychological strain in women with a family history of breast cancer.
    Neise C; Rauchfuss M; Paepke S; Beier K; Lichtenegger W
    Onkologie; 2001 Oct; 24(5):470-5. PubMed ID: 11694774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Belief importance and the theory of planned behaviour: comparing modal and ranked modal beliefs in predicting attendance at breast screening.
    Steadman L; Rutter DR
    Br J Health Psychol; 2004 Nov; 9(Pt 4):447-63. PubMed ID: 15509354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attending the breast screening programme after breast cancer treatment: a population-based study.
    de Munck L; Kwast A; Reiding D; de Bock GH; Otter R; Willemse PH; Siesling S
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 37(6):968-72. PubMed ID: 24075800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical examination as a screening method for breast cancer.
    McLatchie G; McArdle C; Menzies T
    Scott Med J; 1982 Apr; 27(2):152-3. PubMed ID: 7089527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast cancer screening--prevalence of disease in women who only respond after an invitation reminder.
    Hofvind S
    J Med Screen; 2007; 14(1):21-2. PubMed ID: 17362567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Audit of a breast cancer screening programme using clinical examination and lightscanning.
    Braddick MR
    Health Bull (Edinb); 1991 Nov; 49(6):299-303. PubMed ID: 1765479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mammographic screening in women with a family history of breast cancer: some results from the Swedish two-county trial.
    Nixon RM; Pharoah P; Tabar L; Krusemo UB; Duffy SW; Prevost TC; Chen HH
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2000 Aug; 48(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 11011299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Motivational factors for participation in breast cancer screening.
    Frazier TG; Cummings PD
    J Cancer Educ; 1990; 5(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 2400671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk factors for breast cancer with applications to selection for the prevalence screen.
    Alexander FE; Roberts MM; Huggins A
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1987 Jun; 41(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 3498783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Encouraging attendance at a screening mammography programme: determinants of response to different recruitment strategies.
    Schofield PE; Cockburn J; Hill DJ; Reading D
    J Med Screen; 1994 Jul; 1(3):144-9. PubMed ID: 8790507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does mammographic screening and a negative result affect attitudes towards future breast screening?
    Drossaert CH; Boer H; Seydel ER
    J Med Screen; 2001; 8(4):204-12. PubMed ID: 11743037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnosed with breast cancer while on a family history screening programme: an exploratory qualitative study.
    Clements A; Henderson BJ; Tyndel S; Evans G; Brain K; Austoker J; Watson E;
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2008 May; 17(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 18419627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A qualitative study on Singaporean women's views towards breast cancer screening and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) gene testing to guide personalised screening strategies.
    Wong XY; Chong KJ; van Til JA; Wee HL
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Nov; 17(1):776. PubMed ID: 29162038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.