These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7220553)
1. Government funding for elective abortions. Prog Clin Biol Res; 1981; 50():213-43. PubMed ID: 7220553 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Federal financial participation in state claims for abortions. Fed Regist; 1978 Feb; 43(23):4571-82. PubMed ID: 10236701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The economics of abortion access in the US: restrictions on government funding for abortion is the post-Roe battleground. Fried MG Conscience; 2005-2006; 26(4):11-5. PubMed ID: 16619422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare--abortions: final regulation. Fed Regist; 1979 Oct; 44(209):61597-8. PubMed ID: 10297597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Supreme Court and abortion: 1. Upholding constitutional principles. Noonan JT Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Dec; 10(6):14-6. PubMed ID: 7461954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around. Horan DJ; Marzen TJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion 'gag' rule. Notkin H West J Med; 1991 Aug; 155(2):191. PubMed ID: 1926860 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Questions and answers on HEW abortion regulations. Sellers B; Langston L Gov Relat Note; 1978 Feb; 4(4):1-5. PubMed ID: 10297094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. My body, my consent: securing the constitutional right to abortion funding. McDonagh EL Albany Law Rev; 1999; 62(3):1057-1118. PubMed ID: 10558501 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion 1980: the debate continues. Healey JM Conn Med; 1980 Sep; 44(9):605. PubMed ID: 7408487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Office of Human Development Services--service programs for families and children, individuals and families, and aged, blind, or disabled persons; federal financial participation in state claims for abortions. Fed Regist; 1979 Oct; 44(209):61599-600. PubMed ID: 10244085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions. Haas-Wilson D J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Public funding for contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1994. Sollom T; Gold RB; Saul R Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(4):166-73. PubMed ID: 8853282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Why the unconstitutional conditions doctrine is an anachronism (with particular reference to religion, speech, and abortion). Sunstein CR Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Jul; 70(4):593-621. PubMed ID: 15739275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Freedom at home: state constitutions and Medicaid funding for abortions. Vanzi LM N M Law Rev; 1996; 26(3):433-54. PubMed ID: 16100794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Public funding of abortions and abortion counseling for poor women. Edwards RB Adv Bioeth; 1997; 2():303-34. PubMed ID: 12348330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Obama overturns ban on federal funding of family planning organisations that promote abortion. Charatan F BMJ; 2009 Jan; 338():b320. PubMed ID: 19174431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Why the government is not required to subsidize abortion counseling and referral. Hirt TC Harv Law Rev; 1988 Jun; 101(8):1895-915. PubMed ID: 10288539 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]