These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7220605)

  • 1. Voltage waveform effects on output and penetration of W- and Mo-anode mammographic tubes.
    O'Foghludha F; Johnson GA
    Phys Med Biol; 1981 Mar; 26(2):291-303. PubMed ID: 7220605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An experimental "trans-molybdenum" tube for mammography.
    Johnson GA; O'Foghludha F
    Radiology; 1978 May; 127(2):511-6. PubMed ID: 644079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Film-screen mammography x-ray tube anodes: molybdenum versus tungsten.
    Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Rothschild P
    Med Phys; 1989; 16(2):279-83. PubMed ID: 2716707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dependence of scatter on atomic number for x rays from tungsten and molybdenum anodes in the mammographic energy range.
    Aus RJ; DeWerd LA; Pearson DW; Micka JA; Ng KH
    Med Phys; 1999 Jul; 26(7):1306-11. PubMed ID: 10435532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography.
    Boone JM; Fewell TR; Jennings RJ
    Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1863-74. PubMed ID: 9434969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast calcification and mass detection with mammographic anode-filter combinations of molybdenum, tungsten, and rhodium.
    Kimme-Smith CM; Sayre JW; McCombs MM; DeBruhl ND; Bassett LW
    Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):679-83. PubMed ID: 9169688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ambient dose equivalent and effective dose from scattered x-ray spectra in mammography for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and W/Rh anode/filter combinations.
    Künzel R; Herdade SB; Costa PR; Terini RA; Levenhagen RS
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(8):2077-91. PubMed ID: 16585846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography].
    Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Moritz J; Müller D; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiation probe for indirect evaluation of the high-voltage waveform of a Mo anode mammography unit.
    Gambaccini M; Marziani M; Rimondi O; Indovina PL
    Med Phys; 1989; 16(1):94-7. PubMed ID: 2921988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simulation of mammographic x-ray spectra.
    Johnson GA; O'Foghludha F
    Med Phys; 1980; 7(3):189-95. PubMed ID: 7393143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The determination of total filtration on mammographic X-ray sets.
    Robson KJ; Kotre CJ; Faulkner K
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Apr; 65(772):334-8. PubMed ID: 1581792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of anode-filter combinations on image quality and radiation dose in 965 women undergoing mammography.
    Thilander-Klang AC; Ackerholm PH; Berlin IC; Bjurstam NG; Mattsson SL; Månsson LG; von Schéele C; Thunberg SJ
    Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):348-54. PubMed ID: 9114087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Catalog of x-ray spectra of Mo-, Rh-, and W-anode-based x-ray tubes from 10 to 50 kV.
    Ketelhut S; Büermann L; Hilgers G
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 May; 66(11):. PubMed ID: 33902019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of anode/filter combinations in digital mammography with respect to the average glandular dose.
    Uhlenbrock DF; Mertelmeier T
    Rofo; 2009 Mar; 181(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 19241602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal x-ray spectra for screen-film mammography.
    Jennings RJ; Eastgate RJ; Siedband MP; Ergun DL
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(5):629-39. PubMed ID: 7290015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tungsten anode tubes with K-edge filters for mammography.
    Beaman S; Lillicrap SC; Price JL
    Br J Radiol; 1983 Oct; 56(670):721-7. PubMed ID: 6616137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammograms obtained with rhodium vs molybdenum anodes: contrast and dose differences.
    Kimme-Smith C; Wang J; DeBruhl N; Basic M; Bassett LW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jun; 162(6):1313-7. PubMed ID: 8191989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA
    Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suitability of new anode materials in mammography: dose and subject contrast considerations using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4221-35. PubMed ID: 17153401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammographic practice and dosimetry in Britain.
    Fitzgerald M; White DR; White E; Young J
    Br J Radiol; 1981 Mar; 54(639):212-20. PubMed ID: 7470783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.