These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 722214)

  • 1. A toxicity estimation model.
    Enslein K
    J Environ Pathol Toxicol; 1978; 2(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 722214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acute toxicity test with Daphnia magna: an alternative to mammals in the prescreening of chemical toxicity?
    Guilhermino L; Diamantino T; Silva MC; Soares AM
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2000 Jul; 46(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 10903834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Toxicity versus potency: elucidation of toxicity properties discriminating between toxins, drugs, and natural compounds.
    Struck S; Schmidt U; Gruening B; Jaeger IS; Hossbach J; Preissner R
    Genome Inform; 2008; 20():231-42. PubMed ID: 19425137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modelling acute oral mammalian toxicity. 1. Definition of a quantifiable baseline effect.
    Koleva YK; Cronin MT; Madden JC; Schwöbel JA
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Oct; 25(7):1281-93. PubMed ID: 21557997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparisons of acute toxicity of selected chemicals to rainbow trout and rats.
    Delistraty D; Taylor B; Anderson R
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1998 Mar; 39(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 9570910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of two alternative methods for predicting the in vivo toxicities of metallic compounds.
    Hulme LM; Reeves HL; Clothier RH; Smith M; Balls M
    Mol Toxicol; 1987-1988 Fall; 1(4):589-96. PubMed ID: 3509705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Is the prediction of LD50 using cell cultures generally valid?].
    Halle W; Göres E; Baeger I
    Pharmazie; 1987 Dec; 42(12):848-50. PubMed ID: 3444850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reduction of animal use for toxicological evaluation: the Netherlands Health Council report on the LD50.
    van Noordwijk J; Seegers AJ
    Dev Biol Stand; 1986; 64():277-85. PubMed ID: 3792652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Oral acute toxic class method: a successful alternative to the oral LD50 test.
    Schlede E; Genschow E; Spielmann H; Stropp G; Kayser D
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Jun; 42(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 15896439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. NTP toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of 3,3',4,4',5-pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB 126) (CAS No. 57465-28-8) in female Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats (Gavage Studies).
    National Toxicology Program
    Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser; 2006 Jan; (520):4-246. PubMed ID: 16628245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Model for estimation of clinically achievable plasma concentrations for investigational anticancer drugs in man.
    Scheithauer W; Clark GM; Salmon SE; Dorda W; Shoemaker RH; Von Hoff DD
    Cancer Treat Rep; 1986 Dec; 70(12):1379-82. PubMed ID: 3791251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reduction of the numbers of animals used for the classification of the acute oral toxicity of chemicals by taking into account cytotoxicity data from the Registry of Cytotoxicity.
    Halle W; Liebsch M; Traue D; Spielmann H
    ALTEX; 1997; 14(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11178482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acute oral toxicity: variability, reliability, relevance and interspecies comparison of rodent LD50 data from literature surveyed for the ACuteTox project.
    Hoffmann S; Kinsner-Ovaskainen A; Prieto P; Mangelsdorf I; Bieler C; Cole T
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Dec; 58(3):395-407. PubMed ID: 20709128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acute chemical toxicity of uranium.
    Kathren RL; Burklin RK
    Health Phys; 2008 Feb; 94(2):170-9. PubMed ID: 18188051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Carcinogenesis: a predictive structure-activity model.
    Enslein K; Craig PN
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1982; 10(4-5):521-30. PubMed ID: 7161813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comments on the LD50 and acute eye and skin irritation tests. The Animals in Research Committee of the Society of Toxicology and approved by the SOT Council.
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1989 Nov; 13(4):621-3. PubMed ID: 2620785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of acute toxicity to mice by the Arithmetic Mean Toxicity (AMT) modelling approach.
    Raevsky OA; Grigor'ev VJ; Modina EA; Worth AP
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2010 Apr; 21(3-4):265-75. PubMed ID: 20544551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of reliability of predictions and model applicability domain evaluation in the analysis of acute toxicity (LD50).
    Sazonovas A; Japertas P; Didziapetris R
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2010 Jan; 21(1):127-48. PubMed ID: 20373217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of toxicological endpoints by structure-activity relationships.
    Enslein K
    Pharmacol Rev; 1984 Jun; 36(2 Suppl):131S-135S. PubMed ID: 6382350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.