These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 722214)

  • 21. GB toxicity reassessed using newer techniques for estimation of human toxicity from animal inhalation toxicity data: new method for estimating acute human toxicity (GB).
    Bide RW; Armour SJ; Yee E
    J Appl Toxicol; 2005; 25(5):393-409. PubMed ID: 16092087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [The prediction of the toxic effect of chemical substances].
    Nevmerzhitskiĭ NS; Sofronov GA; Tiunov LA
    Voen Med Zh; 1991 Sep; (9):42-5. PubMed ID: 1759357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prediction of aquatic toxicity: use of optimization of correlation weights of local graph invariants.
    Toropov AA; Schultz TW
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(2):560-7. PubMed ID: 12653522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An automated group contribution method in predicting aquatic toxicity: the diatomic fragment approach.
    Casalegno M; Benfenati E; Sello G
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2005 Apr; 18(4):740-6. PubMed ID: 15833034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Intercomparison study on the determination of single administration toxicity in rats.
    Hunter WJ; Lingk W; Recht P
    J Assoc Off Anal Chem; 1979 Jul; 62(4):864-73. PubMed ID: 500537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mink as a predictive model in toxicology.
    Calabrese EJ; Aulerich RJ; Padgett GA
    Drug Metab Rev; 1992; 24(4):559-78. PubMed ID: 1289038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Estimation of acute oral toxicity in rats by determination of the approximate lethal dose rather than the LD50.
    Kennedy GL; Ferenz RL; Burgess BA
    J Appl Toxicol; 1986 Jun; 6(3):145-8. PubMed ID: 3722708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Estimation of maximum tolerated dose for long-term bioassays from acute lethal dose and structure by QSAR.
    Gombar VK; Enslein K; Hart JB; Blake BW; Borgstedt HH
    Risk Anal; 1991 Sep; 11(3):509-17. PubMed ID: 1947356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Analysis of animal weight gains in chronic toxicity studies.
    Johnson AM
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1981 Feb; 7(2):307-16. PubMed ID: 7230278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. On the application of cultured neuroblastoma cells in chemical toxicity screening.
    Walum E; Peterson A
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1984; 13(4-6):511-20. PubMed ID: 6492185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A simple method for screening assessment of acute toxicity of chemicals.
    Yamanaka S; Hashimoto M; Tobe M; Kobayashi K; Sekizawa J; Nishimura M
    Arch Toxicol; 1990; 64(4):262-8. PubMed ID: 2386428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Estimation of risks of irreversible, delayed toxicity.
    Hoel DG; Gaylor DW; Kirschstein RL; Saffiotti U; Schneiderman MA
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1975 Sep; 1(1):133-51. PubMed ID: 810599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The international validation of a fixed-dose procedure as an alternative to the classical LD50 test.
    van den Heuvel MJ; Clark DG; Fielder RJ; Koundakjian PP; Oliver GJ; Pelling D; Tomlinson NJ; Walker AP
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1990 Jul; 28(7):469-82. PubMed ID: 2210519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Shortcomings of LD50-values and acute toxicity testing in animals.
    Rowan A
    Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh); 1983; 52 Suppl 2():52-64. PubMed ID: 6880786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A new approach to practical acute toxicity testing.
    Lorke D
    Arch Toxicol; 1983 Dec; 54(4):275-87. PubMed ID: 6667118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Statistical evaluation of the fixed-dose procedure.
    Whitehead A; Curnow RN
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1992 Apr; 30(4):313-24. PubMed ID: 1628867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Allometric scaling: analysis of LD50 data.
    Burzala-Kowalczyk L; Jongbloed G
    Risk Anal; 2011 Apr; 31(4):523-32. PubMed ID: 21175713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of the up-and-down method and the fixed-dose procedure for acute oral toxicity testing.
    Yam J; Reer PJ; Bruce RD
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1991 Apr; 29(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 2040488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Methodological aspects of acute toxicity testing particularly LD50 determinations present use in development of new drugs.
    Fowler JS; Rutty DA
    Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh); 1983; 52 Suppl 2():20-30. PubMed ID: 6880781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Computer methods for the assessment of toxicity.
    Wold S; Hellberg S; Dunn WJ
    Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh); 1983; 52 Suppl 2():158-89. PubMed ID: 6880779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.