These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7222252)

  • 21. [Brain stem evoked response for audiometric testing].
    Debruyne F
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1981; 35(3-4):267-73. PubMed ID: 7345863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An analysis of the annual audiometric survey of school children in the Greater Glasgow Health Board area for the school year 1979/80.
    Womersley J; Main F; Bryson E; Dunn WR
    Health Bull (Edinb); 1984 Mar; 42(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 6724892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Psychosomatic status affects the relationship between subjective hearing difficulties and the results of audiometry.
    Hashimoto H; Nomura K; Yano E
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Apr; 57(4):381-5. PubMed ID: 15135839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. High frequency Bekesy audiometry. I: equipment and calibration.
    Gauz MT; Brey RH; Ahroon WA
    J Aud Res; 1980 Oct; 20(4):279-94. PubMed ID: 7349307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comfortable loudness judgments for discrete frequency signals.
    Berger KW; Harrison LD; Monack N; Ferren GE
    J Aud Res; 1980 Apr; 20(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 7345058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ambient noise levels in mobile audiometric testing facilities: compliance with industry standards.
    Lankford JE; Perrone DC; Thunder TD
    AAOHN J; 1999 Apr; 47(4):163-7. PubMed ID: 10418346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Monitoring hearing loss at United Airlines.
    Weaver JH; Harper R
    Occup Health Saf; 1981 Aug; 50(8):35-6, 38-9, 48. PubMed ID: 7266965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. ["Audio 4": a simple and quick speech audiometry test for moderate hearing loss screening in four-year-old children].
    Abou Haidar L; Blond MH; Chautemps D; Ployet MJ; Lescanne E
    Arch Pediatr; 2005 Mar; 12(3):264-72. PubMed ID: 15734121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Carriers of the Usher syndrome type IB: is audiometric identification possible?
    Wagenaar M; Snik AF; Kimberling WJ; Cremers CW
    Am J Otol; 1996 Nov; 17(6):853-8. PubMed ID: 8915413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Clinico-audiometric assessment of treatment outcomes in otosclerosis patients].
    Diskalenko VV; Kurmashova LM
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2008; (4):71-3. PubMed ID: 18833127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A multinomial model for identifying significant pure-tone threshold shifts.
    Schlauch RS; Carney E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Dec; 50(6):1391-403. PubMed ID: 18055764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validity of pure-tone hearing screening at well-child visits.
    Halloran DR; Hardin JM; Wall TC
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2009 Feb; 163(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 19188648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Audiometric evaluation in extended high frequencies of individuals exposed to occupational noise].
    Porto MA; Gahyva DL; Lauris JR; Lopes AC
    Pro Fono; 2004; 16(3):237-50. PubMed ID: 15609579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Otological effects of the impulse noise].
    Pankova VB; Sineva EL
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1999; (1):10-2. PubMed ID: 10081408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of audiometric screening criteria for the identification of noise-induced hearing loss in adolescents.
    Meinke DK; Dice N
    Am J Audiol; 2007 Dec; 16(2):S190-202. PubMed ID: 18056872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reference zero for the calibration of air-conduction audiometric equipment using 'tone bursts' as test signals.
    Fedtke T; Richter U
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Jan; 46(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 17365049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH; Ho HC; Wu HP
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Findings of standard and high-frequency audiometry in workers exposed to occupational noise for long durations].
    Türkkahraman S; Gök U; Karlidağ T; Keleş E; Oztürk A
    Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2003 Apr; 10(4):137-42. PubMed ID: 12941983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Measurements of click-evoked otoacoustic emission in industrial workers with noise-induced hearing loss.
    Kowalska S; Sułkowski W
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 1997; 10(4):441-59. PubMed ID: 9575669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Behavioral audiometry: validity of audiometric measurements obtained using the "Delaroche protocol" in babies aged 4--18 months suffering from bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.
    Delaroche M; Thiébaut R; Dauman R
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 70(6):993-1002. PubMed ID: 16324753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.