These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 722252)

  • 1. Perceptual integration of acoustic cues for stop, fricative, and affricate manner.
    Repp BH; Liberman AM; Eccardt T; Pesetsky D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1978 Nov; 4(4):621-37. PubMed ID: 722252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of preceding fricative on stop consonant perception.
    Mann VA; Repp BH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Feb; 69(2):548-58. PubMed ID: 7462477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of following context on perception of the voiced-voiceless distinction in syllable-final stop consonants.
    Repp BH; Williams DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Aug; 78(2):445-57. PubMed ID: 4031246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The resonant dynamics of speech perception: interword integration and duration-dependent backward effects.
    Grossberg S; Myers CW
    Psychol Rev; 2000 Oct; 107(4):735-67. PubMed ID: 11089405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual coherence of speech: stability of silence-cued stop consonants.
    Repp BH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1985 Dec; 11(6):799-813. PubMed ID: 2934509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discriminability and Perceptual Saliency of Temporal and Spectral Cues for Final Fricative Consonant Voicing in Simulated Cochlear-Implant and Bimodal Hearing.
    Kong YY; Winn MB; Poellmann K; Donaldson GS
    Trends Hear; 2016 Jun; 20():. PubMed ID: 27317666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech perception in rats: use of duration and rise time cues in labeling of affricate/fricative sounds.
    Reed P; Howell P; Sackin S; Pizzimenti L; Rosen S
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Sep; 80(2):205-15. PubMed ID: 14674729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Age and hearing loss and the use of acoustic cues in fricative categorization.
    Scharenborg O; Weber A; Janse E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1408-17. PubMed ID: 26428779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Information in speech: observations on the perception of [s]-stop clusters.
    Bailey PJ; Summerfield Q
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1980 Aug; 6(3):536-63. PubMed ID: 6447767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic-phonetic contrasts and intelligibility in the dysarthria associated with mixed cerebral palsy.
    Ansel BM; Kent RD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Apr; 35(2):296-308. PubMed ID: 1573870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Some experiments on the sound of silence in phonetic perception.
    Dorman MF; Raphael LJ; Liberman AM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Jun; 65(6):1518-32. PubMed ID: 489822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the role of the amplitude of the fricative noise in the perception of place of articulation in voiceless fricative consonants.
    Behrens S; Blumstein SE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Sep; 84(3):861-7. PubMed ID: 3183204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perception of the English /s/-/integral of/ distinction relies on fricative noises and transitions, not on brief spectral slices.
    Whalen DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1776-85. PubMed ID: 1960273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speaking rate affects the perception of duration as a suprasegmental lexical-stress cue.
    Reinisch E; Jesse A; McQueen JM
    Lang Speech; 2011 Jun; 54(Pt 2):147-65. PubMed ID: 21848077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual assessment of fricative--stop coarticulation.
    Repp BH; Mann VA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Apr; 69(4):1154-63. PubMed ID: 7229203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability and Repeatability of the Speech Cue Profile.
    Souza P; Wright R; Gallun F; Reinhart P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 61(8):2126-2137. PubMed ID: 30073277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of acoustic cues on labeling fricatives and affricates.
    Hedrick M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Aug; 40(4):925-38. PubMed ID: 9263955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fricative-stop coarticulation: acoustic and perceptual evidence.
    Repp BH; Mann VA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Jun; 71(6):1562-7. PubMed ID: 7108031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The characteristics of voicing in syllable-initial fricatives in American English.
    Pirello K; Blumstein SE; Kurowski K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3754-65. PubMed ID: 9193062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Voiceless affricate/fricative distinction by frication duration and amplitude rise slope.
    Mitani S; Kitama T; Sato Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Sep; 120(3):1600-7. PubMed ID: 17004482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.